Abstract
ObjectivesTo explore the knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs of general practice staff about C reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care tests (POCTs) in routine general practice and associated barriers and facilitators to implementing it to improve the management of acute cough.DesignA qualitative methodology including interviews and focus groups using the Com-B framework to understand individuals’ behaviour to implement CRP POCT in routine general practice. Data were analysed inductively and then aligned to the Com-B framework.SettingA service evaluation of CRP POCT over a 6-month period was previously conducted in randomly selected GP practices from a high prescribing National Health Service Clinicial Commissioning Groups in England. All 11 intervention practices (eight accepting CRPs; three declining CRPs) and the eight control practices, which were not offered CRP POCT, were also invited to interview. A further randomly selected practice not allocated to intervention or control was also invited to participate.ParticipantsSeven of eight accepting CRP, one of three declining CRP and four of nine control practices consented to participate. 12 practices and 26 general practice staff participated; 11 interviews, 3 focus groups and 1 hand-written response.ResultsParticipants reported that CRP POCT can increase diagnostic certainty for acute cough, inform appropriate management, manage patient expectations for antibiotics, support patient education and improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Reported barriers to implementing CRP POCT included: CRP cost, time, easy access to the POCT machine and effects on clinical workflow. Participants with greater CRP use usually had a dedicated staff member with the machine located in their consultation room.ConclusionsCRP POCT can help general practice staff improve patient care and education if incorporated into routine care, but this will need enthusiasts with dedicated POCT instruments or smaller, cheaper, more portable machines. In addition, funding will be needed to support test costs and staff time.
Reference17 articles.
1. Public Health England, 2014. From evidence into action: opportunities to protect and improve the nation’s health https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/366852/PHE_Priorities.pdf (Accessed 07 Mar 2018).
2. Department of Health, 2013. UK five year antimicrobial resistance strategy 2013 to 2018 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244058/20130902_UK_5_year_AMR_strategy.pdf (Accessed 07 Mar 2018).
3. Public Health England, 2017. English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/656611/ESPAUR_report_2017.pdf (Accessed 07 Mar 2018).
4. Potential for reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in English primary care
5. Primary care clinicians’ attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献