Understanding what happens to attendees after an NHS Health Check: a realist review

Author:

Duddy ClaireORCID,Gadsby EricaORCID,Hibberd Vivienne,Krska Janet,Wong Geoff

Abstract

ObjectivesThe NHS Health Check offers adults aged 40–74 an assessment of their risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Attendees should be offered appropriate clinical or behavioural interventions to help them to manage or reduce these risks. This project focused on understanding variation in the advice and support offered to Health Check attendees.DesignWe conducted a realist review, assembling a diverse body of literature via database searches (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, HMIC, Web of Science) and other search methods, and synthesised data extracted from documents using a realist logic of analysis. Our aim was to develop an understanding of contexts affecting delivery of the NHS Health Check and the underlying mechanisms producing outcomes related to the offer for attendees post-Check.ResultsOur findings demonstrate differences in how NHS Health Check commissioners, providers and attendees understand the primary purpose of the programme. A focus on screening for disease can produce an emphasis on high-volume delivery in primary care. When delivery models are organised around behavioural approaches to risk reduction, more emphasis is placed on advice, and referrals to ‘lifestyle services’. However, constrained funding and competing priorities for providers limit what can be delivered within the programme’s remit. Attendees’ experiences and responses to the programme are affected by how the programme is delivered, and by the difficulty of incorporating its outputs into their lives.ConclusionsThe remit of the NHS Health Check should be reviewed with consideration of what can be effectively delivered within existing resources. Variation in delivery may be appropriate to meet local needs, but differences in how the programme’s primary purpose is understood contribute to a ‘postcode lottery’ in post-Check advice and support. Our findings underline existing concerns that the programme may generate inequitable outcomes and raise questions about whether it can deliver positive outcomes for the majority of attendees.Trial registration numberPROSPERO CRD42020163822

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. NHS . NHS Health Check, 2020. Available: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/nhs-health-check/ [Accessed 22/09/2022].

2. Public Health England . NHS Health Check best practice guidance for commissioners and providers; 2020. https://www.healthcheck.nhs.uk/commissioners-and-providers/national-guidance/ [Accessed 22/09/2022].

3. HM Government . Levelling up. Levelling up the United Kingdom. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/levelling-up-the-united-kingdom [Accessed 22/09/2022].

4. The local authorities (Public Health Functions and Entry to Premises by Local Healthwatch Representatives) regulations. Part 2 public health functions: conduct of health checks, 2013. Available: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/351/made [Accessed 22/09/2022].

5. The Local Authorities (Public Health Functions and Entry to Premises by Local Healthwatch Representatives) Regulations 2013. Part 2: Public Health Functions: Health check assessment., 2013. Available: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/351/regulation/4/made/data.pdf [Accessed 21/09/2022].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3