Author:
Christoffersen Nanna Bjørnbak,Nilou Freja Ekstrøm,Thilsing Trine,Larsen Lars Bruun,Østergaard Jane Nautrup,Broholm-Jørgensen Marie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Preventive health checks are assumed to reduce the risk of the development of cardio-metabolic disease in the long term. Although no solid evidence of effect is shown on health checks targeting the general population, studies suggest positive effects if health checks target people or groups identified at risk of disease. The aim of this study is to explore why and how targeted preventive health checks work, for whom they work, and under which circumstances they can be expected to work.
Methods
The study is designed as a realist synthesis that consists of four phases, each including collection and analysis of empirical data: 1) Literature search of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, 2) Interviews with key-stakeholders, 3) Literature search of qualitative studies and grey literature, and 4) Workshops with key stakeholders and end-users. Through the iterative analysis we identified the interrelationship between contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes to develop a program theory encompassing hypotheses about targeted preventive health checks.
Results
Based on an iterative analysis of the data material, we developed a final program theory consisting of seven themes; Target group; Recruitment and participation; The encounter between professional and participants; Follow-up activities; Implementation and operation;Shared understanding of the intervention; and Unintended side effects. Overall, the data material showed that targeted preventive health checks need to be accessible, recognizable, and relevant for the participants’ everyday lives as well as meaningful to the professionals involved.
The results showed that identifying a target group, that both benefit from attending and have the resources to participate pose a challenge for targeted preventive health check interventions. This challenge illustrates the importance of designing the recruitment and intervention activities according to the target groups particular life situation.
Conclusion
The results indicate that a one-size-fits-all model of targeted preventive health checks should be abandoned, and that intervention activities and implementation depend on for whom and under which circumstances the intervention is initiated. Based on the results we suggest that future initiatives conduct thorough needs assessment as the basis for decisions about where and how the preventive health checks are implemented.
Funder
Steno Diabetes Center Zealand
Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus
Steno Diabetes Center Odense
Steno Diabetes Center Nord
Region of Southern Denmark
University Library of Southern Denmark
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference116 articles.
1. Herrett E, Gadd S, Jackson R, Bhaskaran K, Williamson E, van Staa T, et al. Eligibility and subsequent burden of cardiovascular disease of four strategies for blood pressure-lowering treatment: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2019;394(10199):663–71.
2. Khunti K, Mani H, Achana F, Cooper N, Gray LJ, Davies MJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of response rates and diagnostic yield of screening for type 2 diabetes and those at high risk of diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9): e0135702.
3. Løkke A, Ulrik CS, Dahl R, Plauborg L, Dollerup J, Kristiansen LC, et al. Detection of previously undiagnosed cases of COPD in a high-risk population identified in general practice. COPD. 2012;9(5):458–65.
4. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The Health Belief Model. In: K. Glanz R, B.K., Viswanath, K., editor. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theories, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2008.
5. Sheridan SL, Viera AJ, Krantz MJ, Ice CL, Steinman LE, Peters KE, et al. The effect of giving global coronary risk information to adults: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(3):230–9.