Reasons for intending to accept or decline kidney cancer screening: thematic analysis of free text from an online survey

Author:

Freer-Smith Charlotte,Harvey-Kelly Laragh,Mills Katie,Harrison Hannah,Rossi Sabrina H,Griffin Simon J,Stewart Grant D,Usher-Smith Juliet AORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesKidney cancer has been identified as a disease for which screening might provide significant benefit for patients. The aim of this study was to understand in detail the facilitators and barriers towards uptake of a future kidney cancer screening programme, and to compare these across four proposed screening modalities.DesignAn online survey including free-text responses.SettingUKParticipants668 adultsPrimary and secondary outcome measuresThe survey assessed participants’ self-reported intention to take-up kidney cancer screening with four different test methods (urine test, blood test, ultrasound scan and low-dose CT). We conducted thematic analysis of 2559 free-text comments made within the survey using an inductive approach.ResultsWe identified five overarching themes that influenced screening intention: ‘personal health beliefs’, ‘practicalities’, ‘opinions of the test’, ‘attitudes towards screening’ and ‘cancer apprehension’. Overall, participants considered the tests presented as simple to complete and the benefits of early detection to outweigh any drawbacks to screening. Dominant facilitators and barriers varied with patterns of intention to take up screening across the four tests. Most intended to take up screening by all four tests, and for these participants, screening was seen as a positive health behaviour. A significant minority were driven by practicalities and the risks of the tests offered. A smaller proportion intended to reject all forms of screening offered, often due to fear or worry about results and unnecessary medical intervention or a general negative view of screening.ConclusionsMost individuals would accept kidney cancer screening by any of the four test options presented because of strong positive attitudes towards screening in general and the perceived simplicity of the tests. Providing information about the rationale for screening in general and the potential benefits of early detection will be important to optimise uptake among uncertain individuals.

Funder

The Urology Foundation

Renal Cancer Research Fund

Cancer Research UK

Research Trainees Coordinating Centre

Kidney Cancer UK

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. International Variations and Trends in Renal Cell Carcinoma Incidence and Mortality

2. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

3. Cancer incidence and mortality projections in the UK until 2035;Smittenaar;Br J Cancer,2016

4. Office for National Statistics . Cancer survival in England - Office for National Statistics. Available: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/cancersurvivalinengland/nationalestimatesforpatientsfollowedupto2017#:~:text=Cancer survival in children (aged,year and 10-year survival [Accessed 10 Jul 2020].

5. Setting research priorities in partnership with patients to provide patient-centred urological cancer care;Rossi;Eur Urol,2019

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Excessive recommendations on health screening in Korea: analysis of news media and Youtube content related to overdiagnosis;Journal of Public Health;2023-12-21

2. Enhanced study on Deep learning model for kidney segmentation using DCE-MRI;2023 International Conference on Research Methodologies in Knowledge Management, Artificial Intelligence and Telecommunication Engineering (RMKMATE);2023-11-01

3. Artificial intelligence for early detection of renal cancer in computed tomography: A review;Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine;2022-11-11

4. Kidney Tumor Semantic Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Survey of State-of-the-Art;Journal of Imaging;2022-02-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3