Author:
Ramírez Varela Andrea,Contreras-Arrieta Sandra,Tamayo-Cabeza Guillermo,Salas Zapata Leonardo,Caballero-Díaz Yuldor,Hernández Florez Luis Jorge,Benavidez Andrés Patiño,Laajaj Rachid,De la Hoz Fernando,Buitrago Gutierrez Giancarlo,Restrepo Silvia,Behrentz Eduardo
Abstract
ObjectivesTo estimate the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission in close contacts of adults at high risk of infection due to occupation, participants of the CoVIDA study, in Bogotá D.C., Colombia.SettingThe CoVIDA study was the largest COVID-19 intensified sentinel epidemiological surveillance study in Colombia thus far, performing over 60 000 RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study implemented a contact tracing strategy (via telephone call) to support traditional surveillance actions performed by the local health authority.ParticipantsClose contacts of participants from the CoVIDA study.Primary and secondary outcome measuresSARS-CoV-2 testing results were obtained (RT-PCR with CoVIDA or self-reported results). The secondary attack rate (SAR) was calculated using contacts and primary cases features.ResultsThe CoVIDA study performed 1257 contact tracing procedures on primary cases. A total of 5551 close contacts were identified and 1050 secondary cases (21.1%) were found. The highest SAR was found in close contacts: (1) who were spouses (SAR=32.7%; 95% CI 29.1% to 36.4%), (2) of informally employed or unemployed primary cases (SAR=29.1%; 95% CI 25.5% to 32.8%), (3) of symptomatic primary cases (SAR of 25.9%; 95% CI 24.0% to 27.9%) and (4) living in households with more than three people (SAR=22.2%; 95% CI 20.7% to 23.8%). The spouses (OR 3.85; 95% CI 2.60 to 5.70), relatives (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.70) and close contacts of a symptomatic primary case (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.77) had an increased risk of being secondary cases compared with non-relatives and close contacts of an asymptomatic index case, respectively.ConclusionsContact tracing strategies must focus on households with socioeconomic vulnerabilities to guarantee isolation and testing to stop the spread of the disease.
Reference35 articles.
1. Johns Hopkins University . COVID-19 Map - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, 2022. Available: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html [Accessed 11 Mar 2022].
2. Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
3. Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19;Aleta;Nat Hum Behav,2020
4. Sun K , Viboud C . Impact of contact tracing on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Lancet Infect Dis 2020..
5. Lessons from countries implementing find, test, trace, isolation and support policies in the rapid response of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献