Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain

Author:

Lopez-Franco Maria Dolores,Parra-Anguita Laura,Comino-Sanz Ines Maria,Pancorbo-Hidalgo Pedro LORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop and validate a new questionnaire to measure the nurses’ perceptions of the barriers towards the prevention of pressure injuries (PIs) at hospitals.DesignValidation study with mixed methods.SettingFour university hospitals in southern Spain.ParticipantsThe questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. A panel of 14 wound care experts rated the content validity. A sample of 438 nurses (registered nurses and assistant nurses) participated in the survey.Main outcome measuresThe psychometric properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers (PIPB) questionnaire evaluated were: content validity, internal consistency reliability and construct validity.ResultsThe final version of the questionnaire has 25 items grouped into four factors (management and organisation, motivation and priority, knowledge, and staff and collaboration). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit and error indices for the model (Comparative Fit Index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.074). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 (overall), and 0.89 (factor 1), 0.75 (factor 2), 0.72 (factor 3) and 0.45 (factor 4). Construct validity was good, demonstrated by the expected association with the scores on patient safety culture and on considering PIs as an adverse effect of hospital stay, but not with attitude score.ConclusionThe PIPB questionnaire is an instrument useful for measuring nurses’ perceptions of the barriers to PIs prevention. The initial evidence shows that the questionnaire has good content validity, internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Relevance and comprehensiveness need to be assessed in further studies. It can be used both in research and in the evaluation of clinical settings to implementation of PIs preventive programmes in hospitals.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference50 articles.

1. Pressure Injury Stages . The National pressure injury Advisory panel (NPIAP), 2016. Available: https://npiap.com/page/PressureInjuryStages [Accessed 03 Apr 2020].

2. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in Europe, what does the European data tell us: a systematic review;Moore;J Wound Care,2019

3. Prevalence of pressure injuries and other dependence-related skin lesions in adult patients admitted to Spanish hospitals: the fifth national study in 2017;Pancorbo-Hidalgo;Gerokomos,2019

4. Pressure injury prevalence in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients: a state-wide comparison;Coyer;Aust Crit Care,2017

5. The prevalence, incidence, and associated factors of pressure injuries among immobile inpatients: a multicentre, cross-sectional, exploratory descriptive study in China;Liu;Int Wound J,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3