Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop and validate a new questionnaire to measure the nurses’ perceptions of the barriers towards the prevention of pressure injuries (PIs) at hospitals.DesignValidation study with mixed methods.SettingFour university hospitals in southern Spain.ParticipantsThe questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. A panel of 14 wound care experts rated the content validity. A sample of 438 nurses (registered nurses and assistant nurses) participated in the survey.Main outcome measuresThe psychometric properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers (PIPB) questionnaire evaluated were: content validity, internal consistency reliability and construct validity.ResultsThe final version of the questionnaire has 25 items grouped into four factors (management and organisation, motivation and priority, knowledge, and staff and collaboration). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit and error indices for the model (Comparative Fit Index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.074). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 (overall), and 0.89 (factor 1), 0.75 (factor 2), 0.72 (factor 3) and 0.45 (factor 4). Construct validity was good, demonstrated by the expected association with the scores on patient safety culture and on considering PIs as an adverse effect of hospital stay, but not with attitude score.ConclusionThe PIPB questionnaire is an instrument useful for measuring nurses’ perceptions of the barriers to PIs prevention. The initial evidence shows that the questionnaire has good content validity, internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Relevance and comprehensiveness need to be assessed in further studies. It can be used both in research and in the evaluation of clinical settings to implementation of PIs preventive programmes in hospitals.
Reference50 articles.
1. Pressure Injury Stages . The National pressure injury Advisory panel (NPIAP), 2016. Available: https://npiap.com/page/PressureInjuryStages [Accessed 03 Apr 2020].
2. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in Europe, what does the European data tell us: a systematic review;Moore;J Wound Care,2019
3. Prevalence of pressure injuries and other dependence-related skin lesions in adult patients admitted to Spanish hospitals: the fifth national study in 2017;Pancorbo-Hidalgo;Gerokomos,2019
4. Pressure injury prevalence in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients: a state-wide comparison;Coyer;Aust Crit Care,2017
5. The prevalence, incidence, and associated factors of pressure injuries among immobile inpatients: a multicentre, cross-sectional, exploratory descriptive study in China;Liu;Int Wound J,2019
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献