The prevalence of pressure ulcers in Europe, what does the European data tell us: a systematic review

Author:

Moore Zena12345,Avsar Pinar12,Conaty Laura6,Moore David Hugh7,Patton Declan12,O'Connor Tom12

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing & Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI)

2. Skin Wounds and Trauma (SWaT) Research Centre, RCSI

3. Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

4. Professor Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University

5. Honorary Professor, Lida Institute, Shanghai, China

6. Beaumont Hospital, Dublin

7. Trinity College Dublin, Department of Political Science

Abstract

Objective: The main aim of this systematic review was to establish the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PU) within published studies from Europe. Method: Using systematic review methodology, quantitative design studies which explored prevalence data and/or the epidemiology of PUs in Europe were considered. The primary outcome was PU prevalence. The search, conducted in April 2019, using Cochrane, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, returned 3065 records, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool, and validity analysis was undertaken using the Evidence-Based Librarianship (EBL) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Results: We included 79 articles in this review. Across the studies, the median prevalence was 10.8% (standard deviation: 7%; range: 4.6–27.2%). The highest PU prevalence reported was from the Netherlands (27.2%; n=17,494 participants), and the lowest was reported from Finland (4.6%; n=629 participants). Almost 32.4% (n=151,195) of the PUs were category I and the most common site for PUs was the sacrum. Conclusion: The prevalence data is consistently high. These data indicate the continued need for further resource allocation into PU prevention and management

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Nursing (miscellaneous),Fundamentals and skills

Reference101 articles.

1. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guidelines. Emily Haesler (ed). Cambridge Media, 2014

2. A randomised controlled clinical trial of repositioning, using the 30° tilt, for the prevention of pressure ulcers

3. Patient-Reported Pressure Ulcer Pain: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

4. PRESSURE ULCERS AND THEIR IMPACT ON QUALITY OF LIFE

5. Healthy Life-Years Lost and Excess Bed-Days Due to 6 Patient Safety Incidents

Cited by 67 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3