Abstract
IntroductionTraditional dietary assessment methods such as 24-hour recalls and food frequency questionnaires rely on self-reported data and are prone to error, bias and inaccuracy. Identification of dietary metabolites associated with different dietary patterns can provide objective markers of whole diet patterns that account for metabolism and individual responses to dietary interventions. Additionally, few studies have investigated country-specific healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns using metabolomics. Therefore, the current study aims to identify urinary and plasma metabolites that characterise a ‘healthy’ (aligned with current national dietary guidelines) and an ‘unhealthy’ dietary pattern (Typical Australian Diet) in Australian adults.Methods and analysisThe Diet Quality Feeding Study (DQFS) is an 8-week cross-over feeding study that will recruit 40 healthy adults from the Hunter region (NSW, Australia). Data collected includes biospecimens (whole blood, urine, stool) for quantification of dietary metabolite biomarkers; questionnaires (medical history/demographic, physical activity, quality of life); physical measures (anthropometry, body composition, waist circumference, blood pressure, arterial pressure); skin carotenoids and dietary intake (24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaire). Participants will attend the research facility every 2 weeks (end of the run-in, each diet intervention and washout period) for collection of physical measures. All food will be provided to participants for each dietary intervention period, and participants will return to their usual diet during the run-in and washout periods. Targeted and untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and/or proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy will be used to identify metabolites in biospecimens associated with dietary intake.Ethics and disseminationThis study is approved by the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (HNEHREC; 2022/ETH01649) and the University of Newcastle’s Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; H-2022-0330). Findings will be disseminated to study participants, funding bodies supporting the DQFS, peer-review publications and presented at scientific conferences within the field of research.Trial registration numberAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001321730).
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Reference48 articles.
1. Thompson FE , Subar AF . Dietary assessment methodology. In: Coulson A , Rock C , Monsen E , eds. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. San Diago, CA, USA, 2001: 3–30.
2. Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data
3. Validity of dietary assessment methods when compared to the method of doubly labelled water: a systematic review in adults;Burrows;Front Endocrinol,2019
4. Amoutzopoulos B , Steer T , Roberts C , et al . Traditional methods v. new technologies – dilemmas for dietary assessment in large-scale nutrition surveys and studies: a report following an international panel discussion at the 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods (ICDAM9), Brisbane, 3 September 2015: J Nutr Sci 2018;7:e11. doi:10.1017/jns.2018.4
5. Identifying biomarkers of dietary patterns by using metabolomics
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献