Reducing unnecessary vitamin testing in general practice: barriers and facilitators according to general practitioners and patients

Author:

Hofstede H.ORCID,van der Burg H.A.M.,Mulder B.C.,Bohnen A.M.,Bindels P.J.E.,de Wit N.J.,de Schepper E.I.T.,van Vugt S.F.

Abstract

ObjectiveThere has been an increase in testing of vitamins in patients in general practice, often based on irrational indications or for non-specific symptoms, causing increasing healthcare expenditures and medicalisation of patients. So far, there is little evidence of effective strategies to reduce this overtesting in general practice. Therefore, the aim of this qualitative study was to explore the barriers and facilitators for reducing the number of (unnecessary) vitamin D and B12laboratory tests ordered.Design and settingThis qualitative study, based on a grounded theory design, used semistructured interviews among general practitioners (GPs) and patients from two primary care networks (147 GPs, 195 000 patients). These networks participated in the Reducing Vitamin Testing in Primary Care Practice (REVERT) study, a clustered randomized trial comparing two de-implementation strategies to reduce test ordering in primary care in the Netherlands.ParticipantsTwenty-one GPs, with a maximum of 1 GP per practice who took part in the REVERT study, and 22 patients (who were invited by their GP during vitamin-related consultations) were recruited, from which 20 GPs and 19 patients agreed to participate in this study.ResultsThe most important factor hampering vitamin-test reduction programmes is the mismatch between patients and medical professionals regarding the presumed appropriate indications for testing for vitamin D and B12. In contrast, the most important facilitator for vitamin-test reduction may be updating GPs’ knowledge about test indications and their awareness of their own testing behaviour.ConclusionTo achieve a sustainable reduction in vitamin testing, guidelines with clear and uniform recommendations on evidence-based indications for vitamin testing, combined with regular (individual) feedback on test-ordering behaviour, are needed. Moreover, the general public needs access to clear and reliable information on vitamin testing. Further research is required to measure the effect of these strategies on the number of vitamin test requests.Trial registration numberWAG/mb/16/039555.

Funder

Citrien Fund, a national programme of the Dutch government initiated in 2015 (i.e. “Do or don’t” programme).

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Increasing requests for vitamin D measurement: costly, confusing, and without credibility;Sattar;The Lancet,2012

2. Diagnose van vitamine-B12-tekort;Franken;Huisarts Wet,2015

3. Medicare payments for clinical diagnostic laboratory tests in 2016: year 3 of baseline data, 2017. Available: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-17-00140.asp

4. Bilinski K , Boyages S . Evidence of overtesting for vitamin D in Australia: an analysis of 4.5 years of Medicare benefits schedule (Mbs) data. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002955.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002955

5. Vitamin D screening and supplementation in community-dwelling adults: common questions and answers;LeFevre;Am Fam Physician,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3