Abstract
ObjectiveValidity refers to the extent to which evidence and theory support the adequacy and appropriateness of inferences based on score interpretations. The health sector is lacking a theoretically-driven framework for the development, testing and use of health assessments. This study used the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing framework of five sources of validity evidence to assess the types of evidence reported for health literacy assessments, and to identify studies that referred to a theoretical validity testing framework.MethodsA systematic descriptive literature review investigated methods and results in health literacy assessment development, application and validity testing studies. Electronic searches were conducted in EBSCOhost, Embase, Open Access Theses and Dissertations and ProQuest Dissertations. Data were coded to the Standards’ five sources of validity evidence, and for reference to a validity testing framework.ResultsCoding on 46 studies resulted in 195 instances of validity evidence across the five sources. Only nine studies directly or indirectly referenced a validity testing framework. Evidence based on relations to other variables is most frequently reported.ConclusionsThe health and health equity of individuals and populations are increasingly dependent on decisions based on data collected through health assessments. An evidence-based theoretical framework provides structure and coherence to existing evidence and stipulates where further evidence is required to evaluate the extent to which data are valid for an intended purpose. This review demonstrates the use of the Standards’ theoretical validity testing framework to evaluate sources of evidence reported for health literacy assessments. Findings indicate that theoretical validity testing frameworks are rarely used to collate and evaluate evidence in validation practice for health literacy assessments. Use of the Standards’ theoretical validity testing framework would improve evaluation of the evidence for inferences derived from health assessment data on which public health and health equity decisions are based.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Reference148 articles.
1. A theoretical framework for patient-reported outcome measures
2. Social Indicators Research Series, Zumbo BD , Chan EK , eds. Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2014.
3. Montreal Accord on patient-reported outcomes (pros) use series-Paper 7: modern perspectives of measurement validation emphasize justification of inferences based on patient reported outcome scores;Sawatzky;J Clin Epidemiol,2017
4. Interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures through a philosophical lens;Kwon;Qual Life Res,2019
5. AERA, APA, NCME . Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 2014.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献