Integrating an early child development intervention into an existing primary healthcare platform in rural Lesotho: a prospective case–control study

Author:

Ndayizigiye Melino,McBain Ryan,Whelley Collin,Lerotholi Rorisang,Mabathoana Joalane,Carmona Merida,Curtain Joe,Birru Ermyas,Stulac Sara,Miller Ann C,Shin SonyaORCID,Rumaldo Nancy,Mukherjee Joia,Nelson Adrianne KatrinaORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study evaluated a novel early childhood development (ECD) programme integrated it into the primary healthcare system.SettingThe intervention was implemented in a rural district of Lesotho from 2017 to 2018.ParticipantsIt targeted primary caregivers during routine postnatal care visits and through village health worker home visits.InterventionThe hybrid care delivery model was adapted from a successful programme in Lima, Peru and focused on parent coaching for knowledge about child development, practicing contingent interaction with the child, parent social support and encouragement.Primary and secondary outcomes measuresWe compared developmental outcomes and caregiving practices in a cohort of 130 caregiver–infant (ages 7–11 months old) dyads who received the ECD intervention, to a control group that did not receive the intervention (n=125) using a case–control study design. Developmental outcomes were evaluated using the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (EASQ), and caregiving practices using two measure sets (ie, UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), Parent Ladder). Group comparisons were made using multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for caregiver-level, infant-level and household-level demographic characteristics.ResultsAt completion, children in the intervention group scored meaningfully higher across all EASQ domains, compared with children in the control group: communication (δ=0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.26), social development (δ=0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.8) and motor development (δ=0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.31). Caregivers in the intervention group also reported significantly higher adjusted odds of engaging in positive caregiving practices in four of six MICS domains, compared with caregivers in the control group—including book reading (adjusted OR (AOR): 3.77, 95% CI 1.94 to 7.29) and naming/counting (AOR: 2.05; 95% CI 1.24 to 3.71).ConclusionsThese results suggest that integrating an ECD intervention into a rural primary care platform, such as in the Lesothoan context, may be an effective and efficient way to promote ECD outcomes.

Funder

Grand Challenges Canada

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Sea P . Brain matter matters: should we intervene well before preschool? Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 2017.

2. Economic Deprivation and Early Childhood Development

3. Childhood stunting: a global perspective;de Onis;Matern Child Nutr,2016

4. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course

5. Allostasis and allostatic load in the context of poverty in early childhood

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3