Abstract
IntroductionAt least 68% of persons with aphasia (PWA) experience reading difficulties. Even though strategy-based interventions are a promising treatment approach for text level reading comprehension deficits in PWA, empirical evidence for their efficacy remains rare. The primary objective of this study is the analysis of the efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension and on reading activities in PWA.Methods and analysisIn a repeated measures trial, 24 PWA will first participate in a waiting period and then in a strategy-based intervention (14 face-to-face-sessions, 60 min each). We will apply two combinations of strategies to treat either the microstructure or the macrostructure, respectively. Participants will be randomly allocated to two parallel groups that will receive these combinations in interchanged sequences. Assessments will be implemented before and after each period as well as 3 and 6 months after the intervention. The primary outcome measure is text-level reading comprehension measured with a German version of the Test de Compréhension de Textes (TCT-D) and represented by the score TCT-D Total . A non-blinded and a blinded rater will evaluate the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures will address specific reading functions, reading activities and cognitive functions. The sample size was determined with an a priori power analysis. For statistical analysis, we will use contrast analyses within repeated measures analysis of variance models. We expect significant improvements in primary and secondary outcome measures during the intervention as compared with changes during the waiting period.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the ethics committee of Deutscher Bundesverband für akademische Sprachtherapie und Logopädie (20–10074-KA-MunmErw+Ko). Results and relevant data will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at conferences and on the Open Science Framework.Trial registration numberDRKS00021411 (see Supplementary Table 1).
Reference64 articles.
1. Frequency, nature, and predictors of alexia in a convenience sample of individuals with chronic aphasia
2. Reading comprehension difficulties in people with aphasia: investigating personal perception of reading ability, practice, and difficulties;Webster;Aphasiology,2021
3. Application of the ICF in Aphasia
4. Webster J , Samouelle A , Morris J . The brain can’t cope’: Insights about reading from people with chronic aphasia. Available: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p8xh4
5. World Health Organisation, ICF . Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit, Stand Oktober 2005. Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information, 2005. Available: https://www.dimdi.de/dynamic/.downloads/klassifikationen/icf/icfbp2005.zip
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献