Towards safer healthcare: qualitative insights from a process view of organisational learning from failure

Author:

Monazam Tabrizi NegarORCID,Masri Firas

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study adopted a process view of organisational learning to investigate the barriers to effective organisational learning from medical errors.MethodsQualitative data were collected from 40 clinicians in high and low performing hospitals. The fit between the organisational learning process and socio-technical factors was investigated systematically from a pre-reporting stage to reporting and post-reporting stages.ResultsThe analysis uncovered that the major stumbling blocks to active learning lie largely in the post-reporting stages and that they are rooted in social rather than technical issues. Although the experience of the higher-performing hospital provides valuable pointers in terms of creating more trusting environment and using the potential of small failures towards ways in which the organisational learning process in the lower hospital might be improved, due to lack of local mangers’ proactive engagement in integrating changes into practice the active learning takes place in neither of the hospitals.ConclusionsTo ensure that the change solutions are firmly incorporated into the culture and routine practice of the hospital, we need to focus on fostering an organisational culture that encourages positive cooperation and mutual interactions between local managers and frontline clinicians. This process will lead to double-loop learning and an increase in system safety.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. WHO . Patient safety fact file, patient safety and risk management service delivery and safety, 2019. Available: https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/patient_safety/patient-safety-fact-file.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed 01 Apr 2020].

2. WHO . World Health Organization’s 10 facts on patient safety, 2018. Available: https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/patient_safety/en/ [Accessed 01 Apr 2020].

3. More holes than cheese. What prevents the delivery of effective, high quality and safe health care in England?

4. Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study

5. An exploratory study of knowledge brokering in hospital settings: Facilitating knowledge sharing and learning for patient safety?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3