Is anybody ‘Learning’ from Deaths? Sequential content and reflexive thematic analysis of national statutory reporting within the NHS in England 2017-2020

Author:

Brummell ZORCID,Braun D,Hussein Z,Moonesinghe SRORCID,Vindrola-Padros CORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe imperative to learn when a patient dies due to problems in care is absolute. In 2017, the Learning from Deaths (LfDs) framework, a countrywide patient safety programme, was launched in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. NHS Secondary Care Trusts (NSCTs) are legally required to publish quantitative and qualitative information relating to deaths due to problems in care within their organisation, including any learning derived from these deaths.MethodAll LfDs report from 2017 – 2020 were reviewed and evaluated, quantitatively and qualitatively using sequential content and reflexive thematic analysis, through a critical realist lens.ResultsThe majority of NSCTs have identified learning, actions and, to a lesser degree, assessed the impact of these actions. The most frequent learning relates to missed/delayed/uncoordinated care and communication/cultural issues. System issues and lack of resources feature infrequently. There is significant variation amongst NSCTs as to what ‘learning’ in this context actually means and a lack of oversight combining patient safety initiatives.DiscussionEngagement of NSCTs with the LfDs programme varies significantly. Learning as a result of the LfDs programme is occurring. The significance or value of this learning in preventing future patient deaths remains unclear. Consensus about what constitutes effective learning with regards to patient safety needs to be defined and agreed upon.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference59 articles.

1. NHS ‘Learning from Deaths’ reports: a qualitative and quantitative document analysis of the first year of a countrywide patient safety programme

2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. 2018. Crossing the Global Quality Chasm: Improving Health Care Worldwide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25152

3. Berwick D (2013) A promise to learn – a commitment to act: improving the safety of patients in England. London: Department of Health. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226703/Berwick_Report.pdf

4. Francis R (2013) Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/279124/0947.pdf

5. Kirkup B (2015). The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation. London: The Stationary Office. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/408480/47487_MBI_Accessible_v0.1.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3