Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial

Author:

Maroni RobertaORCID,Barnes Jessica,Offman Judith,Scheibl Fiona,Smith Samuel G,Debiram-Beecham Irene,Waller JoORCID,Sasieni PeterORCID,Fitzgerald Rebecca C,Rubin GregORCID,Walter Fiona MORCID,

Abstract

ObjectivesThe BEST3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3, a cell collection device coupled with the biomarker trefoil factor 3, as a tool for detecting Barrett’s oesophagus, a precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), in primary care. In this nested study, our aim was to understand patient experiences.DesignMixed-methods using questionnaires (including Inventory to Assess Patient Satisfaction, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 and two-item perceived risk) and interviews.Outcome measuresParticipant satisfaction, anxiety and perceived risk of developing OAC.SettingGeneral practices in England.ParticipantsPatients with acid reflux enrolled in the intervention arm of the BEST3 trial and attending the Cytosponge appointment (N=1750).Results1488 patients successfully swallowing the Cytosponge completed the follow-up questionnaires, while 30 were interviewed, including some with an unsuccessful swallow.Overall, participants were satisfied with the Cytosponge test. Several items showed positive ratings, in particular convenience and accessibility, staff’s interpersonal skills and perceived technical competence. The most discomfort was reported during the Cytosponge removal, with more than 60% of participants experiencing gagging. Nevertheless, about 80% were willing to have the procedure again or to recommend it to friends; this was true even for participants experiencing discomfort, as confirmed in the interviews.Median anxiety scores were below the predefined level of clinically significant anxiety and slightly decreased between baseline and follow-up (p < 0.001). Interviews revealed concerns around the ability to swallow, participating in a clinical trial, and waiting for test results.The perceived risk of OAC increased following the Cytosponge appointment (p<0.001). Moreover, interviews suggested that some participants had trouble conceptualising risk and did not understand the relationships between test results, gastro-oesophageal reflux and risk of Barrett’s oesophagus and OAC.ConclusionsWhen delivered during a trial in primary care, the Cytosponge is well accepted and causes little anxiety.Trial registration numberISRCTN68382401.

Funder

Medtronic

National Health Service

Medical Research Council

NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

Yorkshire Cancer Research

National Institute for Health Research

Cancer Research UK

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Cancer Research UK . Oesophageal cancer statistics. Available: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/oesophageal-cancer [Accessed 30th Dec 2020].

2. Cancer Research UK . Barrett’s oesophagus. Available: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/other-conditions/barretts-oesophagus/about-barrett%27s [Accessed 30th Dec 2020].

3. Molecular phenotyping reveals the identity of Barrett’s esophagus and its malignant transition

4. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus

5. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3