Abstract
ObjectivesThis study explored self-reported knowledge and interest to learn more about medicines research, development and health technology assessment among Finnish general public. It also aimed to define possible knowledge gaps and needs for public education regarding these topics.DesignOnline survey with 503 participants. The questionnaire was originally developed as a part of the Needs Assessment Work Package of the European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Project. The survey was carried out in Finland in 2019.MethodsThe survey was conducted as an online survey by Kantar TNS Gallup Forum online panel. The data were analysed by using the freely available programming language R. Relationships between the demographic characteristics (such as age, gender and education level) of respondents and their knowledge or interest in medicines research and development were determined using Pearson’s χ2 tests. Statistically significant responses of demographic characteristics in the respondents’ knowledge or interest in medicines research were determined by logistic regression.ResultsOf the 503 respondents (age 16–64) only 12% reported having good or very good knowledge of medicines research and development in general. Regarding health technology assessment, pharmacoeconomics and regulation, the percentage of respondents reporting good or very good knowledge was as low as 8%. Respondents were most interested in learning more about predictive and personalised medicine (47%) and least interested in medicines regulation (30%) and pharmacoeconomics (31%).ConclusionsSelf-reported knowledge about medicines research and development and health technology assessment appears to be very low in Finland. Patient and public participation is recognised as an important and essential element in up-to-date medical research and assessment of new treatments. In order to participate as an active and equal partner in these processes, the public needs more information and education in these topics.
Reference50 articles.
1. Health Research Authority / INVOLVE . Impact of public involvement on ethical aspects of research, 2016. Available: https://www.invo.org.uk/posttypepublication/impact-of-public-involvement-on-the-ethical-aspects-of-research/ [Accessed 12 April 2020].
2. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) . Values and standards for patient involvement in HTa, 2014. Available: https://htai.org/interest-groups/pcig/values-and-standards/ [Accessed 12 April 2020].
3. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
4. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities
5. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献