Abstract
AimThe digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the ‘traditional’ microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.MethodsThe College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2-week washout period.ResultsMG monitor was faster (1090 vs 1159 vs 1181 min, delta of 6–8%, p<0.01), with slightly better performances on the detection of concurrent diseases compared with COTS (κ=1 vs 0.96, 95% CI=0.87 to 1), but equal concordance to the commercial monitors on main diagnosis (κ=1). Minor discrepancies were noted on specific scores/classifications, with MG and PG monitors closer to the reference report (r=0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.91, 95% CI=0.76 to 1, κ=0.93, 95% CI=077 to 1 vs 0.93, 95% CI=0.77 to 1 vs 0.86, 95% CI=0.64 to 1, κ=1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1, for IgA, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody and lupus nephritis, respectively). Streamlined Pipeline for Amyloid detection through congo red fluorescence Digital Analysis detected amyloidosis on both monitors (4 of 30, 13% cases), allowing detection of minimal interstitial deposits with slight overestimation of the Amyloid Score (average 6 vs 7).ConclusionsThe digital transformation needs careful assessment of the hardware component to support a smart and safe diagnostic process. Choosing the display for WSI is critical in the process and requires adequate planning.
Funder
Ministero della Salute
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Reference28 articles.
1. Best practice recommendations for the implementation of a digital pathology workflow in the anatomic pathology laboratory by the European society of digital and integrative pathology (ESDIP);Fraggetta;Diagnostics (Basel),2021
2. Validating whole slide imaging systems for diagnostic purposes in pathology;Evans;Arch Pathol Lab Med,2022
3. Barco launches medical-grade pathology display. 2021. Available: https://www.labpulse.com/diagnostic-technologies/pathology-and-ai/pathology-histology/article/15299674/barco-launches-medical-grade-pathology-display [Accessed 02 Dec 2023].
4. Display characteristics and their impact on digital pathology: a current review of pathologists’ future ‘microscope;Abel;J Pathol Inform,2020
5. Display evaluation for primary diagnosis using digital pathology;Clarke;J Med Imaging (Bellingham),2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献