Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case

Author:

Cazzaniga GiorgioORCID,Mascadri Francesco,Marletta StefanoORCID,Caputo Alessandro,Guidi Gabriele,Gambaro Giovanni,Eccher Albino,Dei Tos Angelo Paolo,Pagni FabioORCID,L'Imperio VincenzoORCID

Abstract

AimThe digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the ‘traditional’ microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.MethodsThe College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2-week washout period.ResultsMG monitor was faster (1090 vs 1159 vs 1181 min, delta of 6–8%, p<0.01), with slightly better performances on the detection of concurrent diseases compared with COTS (κ=1 vs 0.96, 95% CI=0.87 to 1), but equal concordance to the commercial monitors on main diagnosis (κ=1). Minor discrepancies were noted on specific scores/classifications, with MG and PG monitors closer to the reference report (r=0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.91, 95% CI=0.76 to 1, κ=0.93, 95% CI=077 to 1 vs 0.93, 95% CI=0.77 to 1 vs 0.86, 95% CI=0.64 to 1, κ=1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1, for IgA, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody and lupus nephritis, respectively). Streamlined Pipeline for Amyloid detection through congo red fluorescence Digital Analysis detected amyloidosis on both monitors (4 of 30, 13% cases), allowing detection of minimal interstitial deposits with slight overestimation of the Amyloid Score (average 6 vs 7).ConclusionsThe digital transformation needs careful assessment of the hardware component to support a smart and safe diagnostic process. Choosing the display for WSI is critical in the process and requires adequate planning.

Funder

Ministero della Salute

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca

Publisher

BMJ

Reference28 articles.

1. Best practice recommendations for the implementation of a digital pathology workflow in the anatomic pathology laboratory by the European society of digital and integrative pathology (ESDIP);Fraggetta;Diagnostics (Basel),2021

2. Validating whole slide imaging systems for diagnostic purposes in pathology;Evans;Arch Pathol Lab Med,2022

3. Barco launches medical-grade pathology display. 2021. Available: https://www.labpulse.com/diagnostic-technologies/pathology-and-ai/pathology-histology/article/15299674/barco-launches-medical-grade-pathology-display [Accessed 02 Dec 2023].

4. Display characteristics and their impact on digital pathology: a current review of pathologists’ future ‘microscope;Abel;J Pathol Inform,2020

5. Display evaluation for primary diagnosis using digital pathology;Clarke;J Med Imaging (Bellingham),2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3