In Situ Evaluation of Drill Wear Using Tool Image Captured on Machining Center
-
Published:2024-03-05
Issue:2
Volume:18
Page:181-188
-
ISSN:1883-8022
-
Container-title:International Journal of Automation Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJAT
Author:
Furuki Tatsuya1, Nagai Tomoki2, Nishigaki Koichi3, Suda Takashi3, Kousaka Hiroyuki2
Affiliation:
1. Chubu University, 1200 Matsumoto, Kasugai, Aichi 487-8501, Japan 2. Gifu University, Gifu, Japan 3. Okamoto Co., Ltd., Gifu, Japan
Abstract
Owing to the rise in demand for electric devices, there has been an increase in the need for manufacturing equipment that produces internal control board parts. To operate this machinery, several ceramic components, such as a chuck table and fastening parts, are required. Consequently, the need for efficiently and precisely machining ceramics has increased. However, ceramics are known for their high hardness, which can lead to tool breakage when using a small tool. This is often influenced by the state of the tool wear. If the drill tip breaks off and becomes embedded in the workpiece, it could take time to remove or destroy the workpiece. To prevent such problems, drills are replaced after a certain number of machining processes, or the operator visually inspects the drill’s wear condition. Unfortunately, these methods reduce machining efficiency. Therefore, we propose a device that captures drill images on a machine tool and measures the amount of drill wear to evaluate the drill’s condition. We fabricated a device to acquire drill images and attempted to quantify the drill wear condition, such as the area and width of the worn part, by analyzing the worn shape from an image of the bottom surface of the drill.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Reference12 articles.
1. M. Inada, “Chemical basis and manufacturing method of ceramics,” Chemistry & Education, Vol.69, No.1, pp. 20-23, 2021 (in Japanese). 2. O. Okubo, I. Inasaki, T. Aoyama, and T. Shimizu, “Research on the Identification of Causes of Breakage and Prediction of Breakage of Microdiameter Drills,” Trans. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Series C, Vol.51, No.471, pp. 2929-2935, 1985 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaic.51.2929 3. M.-J. Jeong, S.-W. Lee, W.-K. Jang, H.-J. Kim, Y.-H. Seo, and B.-H. Kim, “Prediction of Drill Bit Breakage Using an Infrared Sensor,” Sensors, Vol.21, No.8, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082808 4. S. Tamura, K. Sekigawa, and T. Matsumura, “Monitoring of tool wear distribution with cutting force measurement in drilling,” J. of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, Vol.15, No.4, Article No.JAMDSM0047, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2021jamdsm0047 5. J. Yu, X. Cheng, L. Lu, and B. Wu, “A machine vision method for measurement of machining tool wear,” J. of the Int. Measurement Confederation, Vol.182, Article No.109683, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109683
|
|