Effective Altruism as an Ethical Lens on Research Priorities

Author:

Garrett K. A.123ORCID,Alcalá-Briseño R. I.123,Andersen K. F.123ORCID,Brawner J.1,Choudhury R. A.123,Delaquis E.4,Fayette J.123,Poudel R.5,Purves D.6,Rothschild J.6,Small I. M.17,Thomas-Sharma S.8,Xing Y.123

Affiliation:

1. Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.

2. Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.

3. Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.

4. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

5. Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.

6. Philosophy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.

7. North Florida Research & Education Center, University of Florida, Quincy, FL, U.S.A.

8. Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, U.S.A.

Abstract

Effective altruism is an ethical framework for identifying the greatest potential benefits from investments. Here, we apply effective altruism concepts to maximize research benefits through identification of priority stakeholders, pathosystems, and research questions and technologies. Priority stakeholders for research benefits may include smallholder farmers who have not yet attained the minimal standards set out by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; these farmers would often have the most to gain from better crop disease management, if their management problems are tractable. In wildlands, prioritization has been based on the risk of extirpating keystone species, protecting ecosystem services, and preserving wild resources of importance to vulnerable people. Pathosystems may be prioritized based on yield and quality loss, and also factors such as whether other researchers would be unlikely to replace the research efforts if efforts were withdrawn, such as in the case of orphan crops and orphan pathosystems. Research products that help build sustainable and resilient systems can be particularly beneficial. The “value of information” from research can be evaluated in epidemic networks and landscapes, to identify priority locations for both benefits to individuals and to constrain regional epidemics. As decision-making becomes more consolidated and more networked in digital agricultural systems, the range of ethical considerations expands. Low-likelihood but high-damage scenarios such as generalist doomsday pathogens may be research priorities because of the extreme potential cost. Regional microbiomes constitute a commons, and avoiding the “tragedy of the microbiome commons” may depend on shifting research products from “common pool goods” to “public goods” or other categories. We provide suggestions for how individual researchers and funders may make altruism-driven research more effective. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license .

Publisher

Scientific Societies

Subject

Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3