Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Little is known about how people who have abortions describe high-quality interpersonal care in Argentina. This qualitative study aimed to understand preferences and priorities in their interactions with providers.
Study design
We conducted 24 in-depth interviews with people who obtained abortions at a comprehensive reproductive health clinic or with support from a feminist accompaniment group in Buenos Aires and Neuquén, Argentina. We iteratively coded transcripts using a thematic analysis approach based on interpersonal domains present in current quality of care frameworks.
Results
Participants described high-quality abortion care as feeling acompañamiento and contención from their providers – terms that imply receiving kind, caring, compassionate and emotionally supportive care throughout their abortion. They described four key elements of interpersonal interactions: attentive communication from providers and accompaniers, clear and understandable information provision, non-judgmental support, and individualized options for pain management.
Conclusions
People obtaining abortions in Argentina consistently identified receiving compassionate and supportive care throughout an abortion as a key aspect of care. The findings have implications for incorporating people’s perspectives in the development of care guidelines, training of providers, and monitoring and improving of services. This is particularly important as the government of Argentina prepares to expand legal access to abortion.
Funder
David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Children's Investment Fund Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Ley No 27.610 - Acceso a la Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo (IVE), obligatoriedad de brindar cobertura integral y gratuita | Argentina.gob.ar. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/ley-no-27610-acceso-la-interrupcion-voluntaria-del-embarazo-ive-obligatoriedad-de-brindar. Accessed 25 Jan 2022.
2. Szulik D, Zamberlin N. La legalidad oculta: Percepciones de estigma en los recorridos de mujeres que descubren y acceden a la interrupción legal del embarazo por causal salud. Sex Salud y Soc (Rio Janeiro). 2020;34:46–67. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2020.34.04.A.
3. Serna Botero S, Cárdenas R, Zamberlin N. ¿De qué está hecha la objeción? Relatos de objetores de conciencia a servicios de aborto legal en Argentina, Uruguay y Colombia. Sex Salud y Soc (Rio Janeiro). 2020;33:137–57. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2019.33.08.A.
4. Gomperts R, Jelinska K, Davies S, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kleiverda G. Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no access to safe services. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(9):1171–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01787.x.
5. Dzuba IG, Winikoff B, Peña M. Medical abortion: A path to safe, high-quality abortion care in Latin America and the Caribbean. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care. 2013;18(6):441–50. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2013.824564.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献