Understanding the support needs and preferences of people who self-managed abortion with accompaniment group support in Argentina, Nigeria, and Southeast Asia: a prospective, observational cohort study

Author:

Velarde Marissa1,Jayaweera Ruvani2,Egwuatu Ijeoma3,Nmezi Sybil3,Zurbriggen Ruth4,Grosso Belén4,Kristianingrum Ika Ayu5,Bercu Chiara2,Moseson Heidi2

Affiliation:

1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

2. Ibis Reproductive Health

3. Generation Initiative for Women and Youth

4. La Revuelta Colectiva Feminista

5. Samsara

Abstract

Abstract Background Increasingly, people use medication abortion pills to end their pregnancies on their own, without clinical supervision–a practice known as self-managed abortion (SMA). Additionally, some obtain support through a community-based care model known as the “accompaniment” model, in which volunteer-activists provide evidence-based information about medication abortion and counselling through the SMA process over the phone or in-person. Understanding factors associated with the support and care received during SMA with accompaniment can provide insight into people’s satisfaction with this community-based model of abortion care and identify opportunities to further improve this model of care, which is particularly important in legally restrictive settings. Additionally, a large proportion of people who have abortions are parents, but little research has explored the unique needs and preferences for SMA among parents. Methods This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, observational cohort study conducted in three countries among people who self-managed an abortion with accompaniment support. We implemented bivariate analyses to evaluate differences between participants who reported feeling sufficient social support during their abortion and who preferred SMA over clinical models of care, with those who did not. We used logistic regression models to explore whether the number of children a participant had was associated with feeling supported during the accompanied SMA process, and separately with preferred model of abortion care. Results While most participants felt fully supported by their social group and preferred SMA over facility-based abortion care, several characteristics were associated with not having felt supported and preferring facility-based abortion care in bivariate analyses: namely, those with less formal education, a history of prior abortion, and those who sought care at a health facility during their SMA. In adjusted logistic regression models, we found no association between number of children and feeling sufficient social support, or preference for SMA. Conclusions These results establish that most people who have an accompanied SMA feel fully supported during their abortion process and prefer SMA over facility-based care.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3