Abstract
Abstract
Background
The importance of improving men’s and women’s knowledge of sexual and reproductive health has been emphasised in numerous global health policies. Fertility awareness literature highlights a disproportionately higher number of articles related to pregnancy-prevention compared to pregnancy-planning, which is justifiable in many contexts. However, recent concerted effort to improve fertility-awareness warrants a closer investigation of basic reproductive health terminologies. The objective of this study is to explore participants’ views of “family building” and provide a definition.
Methods
We conducted 35 qualitative in-depth interviews on men, women and healthcare professionals who were sampled from a UK cross-sectional survey. We asked participants about terms such as ‘family planning’ and ‘family building’ to elicit views and explored the appropriateness of the term “family building.” Data were transcribed and analysed via Framework analysis.
Results
When asked what ‘family planning’ meant to them, study participants stated that the term meant the avoidance of pregnancy. They viewed it as an “umbrella term for the use of contraception methods,” that “paradoxically, the term family planning almost has a negative connotation regarding having a family,” but could not state similar terminology for planning a family. Reasons cited for this perspective include the focus of school education and usage in clinical settings.
Conclusions
In the absence of an explicit definition in literature, we generated a new definition for family building as follows: “Family building refers to the construction or formation of a family, which can include steps or actions taken by an individual towards having children. In contrast to family planning, the intent focuses on pregnancy planning and childbearing rather than pregnancy prevention. However, it can also include actions taken to space the number of children one has.” Some balance in the global public health messages, including bridging the gap in reproductive health literature, policies, processes and practices may contribute to the effort to improve fertility knowledge. Use of appropriate terminologies help optimise reproductive health services in order to enable men and women achieve their desired fertility intentions, whatever they may be.
Trial registration Not applicable
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference41 articles.
1. UNITED NATIONS. Guidelines on Reproductive Health [Internet]. Guidelines on Reproductive Health. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 21]. Available from: http://www.un.org/popin/unfpa/taskforce/guide/iatfreph.gdl.html.
2. United Nations PopulationFund. Sexual & reproductive health | UNFPA—United Nations Population Fund [Internet]. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 21]. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sexual-reproductive-health.
3. World Health Organization. WHO regional strategy on sexual and reproductive health. 2015 [cited 2015 Aug 27]; Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/sexual-and-reproductive-health/publications/pre-2007/who-regional-strategy-on-sexual-and-reproductive-health.
4. FIGO. Committee for Reproductive Medicine | FIGO [Internet]. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2015 [cited 2015 Aug 27]. Available from: http://www.figo.org/committee-reproductive-medicine.
5. Craig AD, Dehlendorf C, Borrero S, Harper CC, Rocca CH. Exploring young adults’ contraceptive knowledge and attitudes: disparities by race/ethnicity and age. Women’s Heal Issues. 2014;24(3).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献