Barriers to Family Building Among Physicians and Medical Students

Author:

King Zoe12,Zhang Qiang3,Liang Jane W.4,Levy Morgan S.56,Plowden Torie C.7,Jeelani Roohi89,Marshall Ariela L.10,Barnett Rebecca56,Caban-Martinez Alberto J.56,Brown Alyssa11,Mueller Claudia M.12,Brown-Johnson Cati1,Salles Arghavan1314

Affiliation:

1. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

2. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

3. University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles

4. Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

5. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

6. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

7. Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland

8. Department of OB/GYN, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan

9. Kindbody Fertility Clinic, Chicago, Illinois

10. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

11. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

12. Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

13. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

14. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

Abstract

ImportancePhysicians and medical students who desire to build families face significant barriers due to the structure and culture of medicine.ObjectiveTo understand the barriers and facilitators to family building for all people in medicine—not only individuals who can become pregnant—through an open-ended, qualitative analysis of survey responses.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis qualitative study used a survey conducted in April and May 2021 with a broad sample of physicians and medical students. Participants were recruited through social media, targeting physician and medical student communities. Physicians (residents, fellows, and physicians in independent practice) and medical students of all gender identities and sexual orientations were included. Informed by a postpositivist approach, coding reliability thematic analysis was performed on 3 open-ended survey questions on family-building experiences (what they would do differently, what advice they have for others, and anything else they wished to share).Main Outcomes and MeasuresIdentified themes were mapped to the social-ecological model, a model used in public health to examine how a spectrum of factors is associated with health outcomes.ResultsA total of 2025 people (1860 [92%] women; 299 [15%] Asian, 151 [8%] Black, and 1303 [64%] White; 1730 [85%] heterosexual; and 1200 [59%] physicians who had completed training) responded to at least 1 of 3 open-ended questions. Themes mapped to social-ecological model levels included: (1) cultural, eg, medical training being at odds with family building; (2) organizational, eg, lack of institutional support for the range of family-building routes; (3) interpersonal, eg, impact of social support on family building; and (4) individual, eg, socioeconomic status and other individual factors that facilitate or inhibit family building. Recommendations to improve family-building experiences include implementing family-building curricula at medical schools, providing adequate parental leave for all physicians and medical students who become parents, and providing insurance coverage for all family-building routes.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this qualitative study of physicians and medical students, self-reported barriers to family building were identified at each level of the social-ecological model. Addressing these barriers is critical to creating a more equitable family-building environment for physicians and medical students.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3