Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fiber maturity is a key cotton quality property, and its variability in a sample impacts fiber processing and dyeing performance. Currently, the maturity is determined by using established protocols in laboratories under a controlled environment. There is an increasing need to measure fiber maturity using low-cost (in general less than $20 000) and small portable systems. In this study, a laboratory feasibility was performed to assess the ability of the shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR HSI) technique for determining the conditioned fiber maturity, and as a comparison, a bench-top commercial and expensive (in general greater than $60 000) near infrared (NIR) instrument was used.
Results
Although SWIR HSI and NIR represent different measurement technologies, consistent spectral characteristics were observed between the two instruments when they were used to measure the maturity of the locule fiber samples in seed cotton and of the well-defined fiber samples, respectively. Partial least squares (PLS) models were established using different spectral preprocessing parameters to predict fiber maturity. The high prediction precision was observed by a lower root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) (< 0.046), higher Rp2 (> 0.518), and greater percentage (97.0%) of samples within the 95% agreement range in the entire NIR region (1 000∼2 500 nm) without the moisture band at 1 940 nm.
Conclusion
SWIR HSI has a good potential for assessing cotton fiber maturity in a laboratory environment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
Reference34 articles.
1. Al Ktash M, Hauler O, Ostertaga E, et al. Ultraviolet-visible/near infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging to study the different types of raw cotton. J Spectr Imaging. 2020;9:a18. https://doi.org/10.1255/jsi.2020.a18.
2. Anthony WS, Meredith WR, Williford JR. Neps in ginned lint: the effects of cultivars, harvesting, and ginning practices. Text Res J. 1988;58:633–40.
3. ASTM D8394-21. Standard test method for automated measurement of maturity, fineness, ribbon width, and micronaire of cotton fibers. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2021.
4. Ayele AG, Kelly BR, Hequet EF. Evaluating within-plant variability of cotton fiber length and maturity. Agron J. 2018;110:47–55. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.06.0359.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献