1. Stirling A. Is the new European ruling on GM techniques ‘anti-science’? 2018.
https://steps-centre.org/blog/european-court-of-justice-ecj-gene-editing-anti-science/
. Accessed 22 Aug 2018
2. Judgement of the Court (Grand Chamber), 25 July 2018 in Case C-528/16.
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d0f130dcd5adc6577ba74dc9b5acf2530b87e485.e34KaxiLc3eQc40LaxqMbN4Pb3yRe0?text=&docid=204387&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=72898
. Accessed 28 July 2018
3. Expert reaction to Court of Justice of the European Union ruling that GMO rules should cover plant genome editing techniques.
http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-ruling-that-gmo-rules-should-cover-plant-genome-editing-techniques/
. Accessed 1 Nov 2018
4. Friebe R, Warnecke T, Kühne A. Reaktionen auf den EuGH zur Gen-Schere CRISPR: “Ein richtig schlechtes Urteil”. 2018.
https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/reaktionen-auf-den-eugh-zur-gen-schere-crispr-ein-richtig-schlechtes-urteil/22851838.html
. Accessed 30 Aug 2018
5. The Observer view on Europe’s ban on gene-editing crops. Observer editorial.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/29/observer-view-on-europe-ban-on-gene-editing-crops
. Accessed 1 Nov 2018