Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pancreatoduodenectomy and subtotal esophagectomy are widely considered the most invasive and difficult surgical procedures in gastrointestinal surgery. Subtotal esophagectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy is expected to be extremely difficult due to complicated anatomical changes, and selecting an appropriate intestinal reconstruction method will also be a difficult task. Therefore, perhaps because the method is considered impossible, there have been few reports of subtotal esophagectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Case presentation
A 73-year-old man with a history of pancreatoduodenectomy was diagnosed with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Definitive chemoradiation therapy was recommended at another hospital; however, he visited our department to undergo surgery. We performed the robot-assisted thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. There were some difficulties with the reconstruction: the gastric tube could not be used, the reconstruction was long, and the organs reconstructed in the previous surgery had to be preserved. However, the concurrent reconstruction was achieved with the help of a free jejunal flap and vascular reconstruction. All reconstructions from the previous surgery, including the remnant stomach, were preserved via regional abdominal lymph node dissection. After reconstruction, intravenous indocyanine green showed that circulation in the reconstructed intestines was preserved. On postoperative day 1, no recurrent nerve paralysis was observed during laryngoscopy. The patient could start oral intake smoothly 2 weeks after surgery and did not exhibit any postoperative complications related to the reconstruction. The patient was transferred to another hospital on postoperative day 21.
Conclusions
Owing to the free jejunal flap interposition method, we safely performed one stage subtotal esophagectomy and concurrent reconstruction, preservation of the remnant stomach, and pancreaticobiliary reconstruction in patients with a history of pancreatoduodenectomy. We believe that this method is acceptable and useful for patients undergoing complicated reconstruction.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference10 articles.
1. Kitagawa Y, Ishihara R, Ishikawa H, Ito Y, Oyama T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2023;20:34372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-00993-2.
2. Fukaya M, Nishio H, Kobayashi S, Itatsu K, Funasaka K, Shimoyama Y, et al. Synchronous double primary cancer of the esophagus and ampulla of Vater successfully treated by a two-stage operation: report of a case. Esophagus. 2016;13:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-015-0509-1.
3. Fukaya M, Abe T, Yokoyama Y, Itatsu K, Nagino M. Two-stage operation for synchronous triple primary cancer of the esophagus, stomach, and ampulla of Vater: report of a case. Surg Today. 2014;44:967–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0549-x.
4. Shiryajev YN, Kurosaki I, Radionov YV, Kashintsev AA, Kokhanenko NY. Esophagectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy in the same patient: tactical and technical considerations. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2014;61:1246–52.
5. Inoue A, Akita H, Eguchi H, Hama N, Wada H, Kawamoto K, et al. Gastric conduit-preserving, radical pancreaticoduodenectomy with microvascular reconstruction for pancreatic head cancer after esophagectomy: report of a case. Surg Today. 2014;44:786–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0791-2.