Author:
Crawford Rebecca J.,Malone Quentin J.,Price Roger I.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Alfieri A. Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future. 2014. p. 975052.
2. Wu AM, Zhou Y, Li QL, Wu XL, Jin YL, Luo P, Chi YL, Wang XY. Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97142.
3. van den Akker-van Marle ME, Moojen WA, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Peul WC. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost utility analysis. Spine J. 2014;16:702–10.
4. Lee SH, Seol A, Cho TY, Kim SY, Kim DJ, Lim HM. A systematic review of interspinous dynamic stabilization. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7:323–9.
5. Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Neroni M, Fiore C, Faiola A, Puzzilli F, Callovini G, Alfieri A. Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E14.