Attitudes of European students towards family decision-making and the harmonisation of consent systems in deceased organ donation: a cross-national survey

Author:

Molina-Pérez Alberto,Werner-Felmayer Gabriele,Van Assche Kristof,Jensen Anja M. B.,Delgado Janet,Flatscher-Thöni Magdalena,Hannikainen Ivar R.,Rodriguez-Arias David,Schicktanz Silke,Wöhlke Sabine

Abstract

Abstract Background European countries are increasingly harmonising their organ donation and transplantation policies. Although a growing number of nations are moving to presumed consent to deceased organ donation, no attempts have been made to harmonise policies on individual consent and the role of the family in the decision-making process. Little is known about public awareness of and attitudes towards the role of the family in their own country and European harmonisation on these health policy dimensions. To improve understanding of these issues, we examined what university students think about the role of the family in decision-making in deceased organ donation and about harmonising consent policies within Europe. Methods Using LimeSurvey© software, we conducted a comparative cross-sectional international survey of 2193 university students of health sciences and humanities/social sciences from Austria (339), Belgium (439), Denmark (230), Germany (424), Greece (159), Romania (190), Slovenia (190), and Spain (222). Results Participants from opt-in countries may have a better awareness of the family’s legal role than those from opt-out countries. Most respondents opposed the family veto, but they were more ambivalent towards the role of the family as a surrogate decision-maker. The majority of participants were satisfied with the family’s legal role. However, those who were unsatisfied preferred to limit family involvement. Overall, participants were opposed to the idea of national sovereignty over consent policies. They favoured an opt-out policy harmonisation and were divided over opt-in. Their views on harmonisation of family involvement were consistent with their personal preferences. Conclusions There is overall division on whether families should have a surrogate role, and substantial opposition to granting them sole authority over decision-making. If European countries were to harmonise their policies on consent for organ donation, an opt-out system that grants families a surrogate decision-making role may enjoy the widest public support.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference35 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO), Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT). Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. http://www.transplant-observatory.org/. Accessed 20 Jun 2022.

2. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare — Council of Europe. Newsletter Transplant. International figures on donation and transplantation 2019. Free publications from EDQM. 2020. https://freepub.edqm.eu/publications/NT-archive/detail. Accessed 20 Jun 2022.

3. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare — Council of Europe. Newsletter Transplant. International figures on donation and transplantation 2020. Free publications from EDQM. 2021. https://freepub.edqm.eu/publications/NT-archive/detail. Accessed 20 Jun 2022.

4. European Commission, Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency, van Schoten S, Coppen R, Wiegers T, Bouwman R, Friele R. Study on the uptake and impact of the EU action plan on organ donation and transplantation (2009-2015) in the EU Member States: factor study. Publications Office of the European Union. 2017. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2818/247136. Accessed 20 Jun 2022.

5. Van der Spiegel S, Schröder-Bäck P, Brand H. Organ transplantation and the European Union, 2009–2015 developments. Transpl Int. 2020;33:603–11.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3