Author:
Mehrifar Younes,Ramezanifar Soleiman,Khazaei Parvaneh,Azimian Afsane,khadiv Elahe,Dargahi-Gharehbagh Ozra,Sahlabadi Ali Salehi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Due to the type of activities and the long-term exposure to chemicals, hospital cleaning workers require the necessary knowledge about the chemicals used and proper safety culture. This study aimed to evaluate the safety culture and perception of hospital cleaning workers' warning signs of chemical hazards.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022 with the participation of 68 cleaning workers with the mean age ± (SD) and work experience ± (SD) of 36.19 ± (7.619) and 9.21 ± (5.462), respectively, in four selected Tehran hospitals in Iran. After ensuring the confidentiality of the received information and completing the demographic information checklist, each participant completed Global Harmonization System (GHS) sign perception and the safety culture questionnaires in this survey. Data were analyzed using regression and Pearson correlation tests.
Results
This study showed that the participant's correct perception in nine cases (81.8%) of presented GHS signs was lower than the ANSI Z535.3 standard. Among the investigated signs, "Flammable substances" and "Harmful to the environment" signs had the highest, and "Skin irritant" signs had the lowest correct perception. In addition, it was found that 55 people (80.9%) had an overall positive attitude toward the safety culture. The levels of "Work environment" (83.8%) and "Information exchange" (76.5%) had the highest and lowest positive scores for safety culture. Furthermore, there is a direct and significant relationship between the overall score of safety culture and the overall perception of the symptoms of GHS (CC = 0.313, P = 0.009).
Conclusion
According to the obtained results, it is recommended to take the necessary measures to increase the employees' perception of the signs of chemical substances and improve their safety culture.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference39 articles.
1. Wang X, Zhang Y, Wu Q, Jin X. Assessing Chemical Safety Knowledge of University Students─ A Case Study. J Chem Educ. 2022;99(2):571–7.
2. Fayazi A, Pouyakian M, Jafari MJ, Khodakarim S. Development and validation of two awareness and current status assessment questionnaires for the hazardous chemically-exposed staffs though Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). Health Saf Work. 2019;9(1):29–39.
3. Zaip ND, Samad NI, Naim F, Hamzah NA. Assessment of chemical safety awareness among university laboratory workers. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2021;17(SUPP8):109–15.
4. Ruokolainen J, Hyttinen M, Sorvari J, Pasanen P. Exposure of cleaning workers to chemical agents and physical conditions in swimming pools and spas. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2022;15(3):521–40.
5. Ziara KS, Ibraheem AK, Al-Furaiji A. Chemical safety awareness for undergraduate analytical chemistry students: a case study at Baghdad University, Republic of Iraq. Scholars Int J Chem Mater Sci. 2021;4(4):30–5.