Author:
Murray Maureen H.,Byers Kaylee A.,Buckley Jacqueline,Magle Seth B.,Maffei Dorothy,Waite Preeya,German Danielle
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Encounters with rats in urban areas increase risk of human exposure to rat-associated zoonotic pathogens and act as a stressor associated with psychological distress. The frequency and nature of human-rat encounters may be altered by social distancing policies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, restaurant closures may reduce food availability for rats and promote rat activity in nearby residential areas, thus increasing public health risks during a period of public health crisis. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with increased perceived exposure to rats during a stay-at-home order, describe residents’ encounters with rats relevant to their health and well-being, and identify factors associated with increased use of rodent control.
Methods
Urban residents in Chicago, a large city with growing concerns about rats and health disparities, completed an online questionnaire including fixed response and open-ended questions during the spring 2020 stay-at-home order. Analyses included ordinal multivariate regression, spatial analysis, and thematic analysis for open-ended responses.
Results
Overall, 21% of respondents (n = 835) reported an increase in rat sightings around their homes during the stay-at-home order and increased rat sightings was positively associated with proximity to restaurants, low-rise apartment buildings, and rat feces in the home (p ≤ 0.01). Many respondents described feeling unsafe using their patio or yard, and afraid of rats entering their home or spreading disease. Greater engagement with rodent control was associated with property ownership, information about rat control, and areas with lower incomes (p ≤ 0.01).
Conclusions
More frequent rat encounters may be an unanticipated public health concern during periods of social distancing, especially in restaurant-dense areas or in low-rise apartment buildings. Rat presence may also limit residents’ ability to enjoy nearby outdoor spaces, which otherwise might buffer stress experienced during a stay-at-home order. Proactive rat control may be needed to mitigate rat-associated health risks during future stay-at-home orders.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference33 articles.
1. Himsworth CG, Parsons KL, Jardine C, Patrick DM. Rats, cities, people, and pathogens: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of literature regarding the ecology of rat-associated zoonoses in urban centers. Vector-Borne Zoo Dis. 2013;13(6):349–59. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2012.1195.
2. German D, Latkin CA. Exposure to urban rats as a community stressor among low-income urban residents. J Commun Psychol. 2016;44(2):249–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21762.
3. Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of vertebrate species invasions into the United States. Manag Vertebr Invasive Species Proc an Int Symp. 2007:1–8.
4. Singleton GR, Leirs H, Hinds LA, Zhang Z. Ecologically-based management of rodent pests – re-evaluating our approach to an old problem. In: Ecologically-based Management of Rodent Pests. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR); 1999. p. 17–29.
5. Murray MH, Fyffe R, Fidino M, Byers KA, Ríos MJ, Mulligan MP, et al. Public complaints reflect rat relative abundance across diverse urban neighborhoods. Front Ecol Evol. 2018;6:189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00189.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献