Author:
de Londras Fiona,Cleeve Amanda,Rodriguez Maria I.,Farrell Alana,Furgalska Magdalena,Lavelanet Antonella
Abstract
AbstractThis review follows an established methodology for integrating human rights to address knowledge gaps related to the health and non-health outcomes of mandatory waiting periods (MWPs) for access to abortion. MWP is a requirement imposed by law, policy, or practice, to wait a specified amount of time between requesting and receiving abortion care. Recognizing that MWPs “demean[] women as competent decision-makers”, the World Health Organization recommends against MWPs. International human rights bodies have similarly encouraged states to repeal and not to introduce MWPs, which they recognize as operating as barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive healthcare. This review of 34 studies published between 2010 and 2021, together with international human rights law, establishes the health and non-health harms of MWPs for people seeking abortion, including delayed abortion, opportunity costs, and disproportionate impact. Impacts on abortion providers include increased workloads and system costs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference58 articles.
1. The World Health Organization, “Abortion Care Guideline” (2022).
2. World Health Organization, Global abortion policies database (2018) https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/ accessed [29 Oct 2021].
3. Lavelanet A, Johnson BR, Ganatra B. Global abortion policies database: a descriptive analysis of the regulatory and policy environment related to abortion. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;62:25–35.
4. World Health Organization, “Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems” 2nd (2012).
5. CEDAW, General recommendation No. 34 on the rights of rural women (2016) (UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/34).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献