Reproducing Timely Subjects: How Abortion Law Calendars Social Reproduction

Author:

Fletcher Ruth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Queen Mary University of London, UK

Abstract

Drawing on feminist social reproduction theory and its concern for time spent reproducing the workers of tomorrow, this paper turns to Ireland's new periodic abortion law as a key source of knowledge for social reproduction. I show how law takes different qualitative approaches to measuring reproductive time as it uses a 12 week time limit to distinguish between better and worse reproductive subjects in a context of time poverty. I develop an account of calendaring, with its timelines, punctuations and paces, as a key concept of social reproduction that explains these different legal approaches. Calendars plot reproductive timelines with abstract and concrete moments; they punctuate timelines with different expectations of timeliness, and pace progress with administrative procedures like deadlines and waiting periods. In the process, some become entitled to abortion as timely subjects, others have to make a special case for their exceptional timeliness, and the possibility of being timed out of access threatens all with uneven effects. Periodic abortion law plays a key role in reproducing timely subjects and generating techniques for managing reproductive life cycles in capitalist societies.

Funder

The Leverhulme Trust

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3