Abstract
AbstractThe article spotlights the impediments of the localization agenda in the Rohingya response in Bangladesh through the notion of humanitarian space. The Rohingyas rely entirely on material aid and humanitarian services in the camps, mainly stemming from international actors committed to the localization agenda, which, however, has not been effectively implemented. Drawing on the definition of humanitarian space as an arena, we investigate the main negotiations within humanitarian space in the Rohingya response and how they impede the realization of the localization agenda. We conducted secondary data analysis on reports published by organizations involved and validated the findings with ten telephone interviews with organizations in Bangladesh. We identified three main negotiations. First, negotiation on the nature of the partnership between local and international humanitarian actors, including the debates on the definition of “local”; second, negotiation concerning the characteristics and appreciation of local capacity; and third, the negotiation related to constraints within the operating environment for humanitarian actors in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. We conclude that the lens of humanitarian space is necessary for further understanding the dynamics impeding localization in the Rohingya response in particular and humanitarian action in general.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. ADSP (2020) Rohingya in South East Asia: opportunities for engagement. In: Asia displacement solutions platform. Available at: https://adsp.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ADSP_2020_ROHINGYA-IN-SOUTHEAST-ASIA_V1.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2021
2. Abild E (2010) Creating humanitarian space: a case study of Somalia. Refugee Survey Quarterly 29(3):67–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdq030
3. Ansar A, Khaled AFM (2021) From solidarity to resistance: host communities’ evolving response to the Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. J Intern Human Action 6(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-021-00104-9
4. Barbelet V (2018) As local as possible, as international as necessary. Available at: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/As_local_as_possible_as_international_as_necessary_understanding_capacity_and_comp.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2021.
5. Barbelet, V (2019) Rethinking capacity and complementarity for a more local humanitarian action. In: Overseas Development Institute. Available at: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/12957.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2021
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献