Impediments to localization agenda: humanitarian space in the Rohingya response in Bangladesh

Author:

Khan Abdul KadirORCID,Kontinen TiinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe article spotlights the impediments of the localization agenda in the Rohingya response in Bangladesh through the notion of humanitarian space. The Rohingyas rely entirely on material aid and humanitarian services in the camps, mainly stemming from international actors committed to the localization agenda, which, however, has not been effectively implemented. Drawing on the definition of humanitarian space as an arena, we investigate the main negotiations within humanitarian space in the Rohingya response and how they impede the realization of the localization agenda. We conducted secondary data analysis on reports published by organizations involved and validated the findings with ten telephone interviews with organizations in Bangladesh. We identified three main negotiations. First, negotiation on the nature of the partnership between local and international humanitarian actors, including the debates on the definition of “local”; second, negotiation concerning the characteristics and appreciation of local capacity; and third, the negotiation related to constraints within the operating environment for humanitarian actors in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. We conclude that the lens of humanitarian space is necessary for further understanding the dynamics impeding localization in the Rohingya response in particular and humanitarian action in general.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference84 articles.

1. ADSP (2020) Rohingya in South East Asia: opportunities for engagement. In: Asia displacement solutions platform. Available at: https://adsp.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ADSP_2020_ROHINGYA-IN-SOUTHEAST-ASIA_V1.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2021

2. Abild E (2010) Creating humanitarian space: a case study of Somalia. Refugee Survey Quarterly 29(3):67–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdq030

3. Ansar A, Khaled AFM (2021) From solidarity to resistance: host communities’ evolving response to the Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. J Intern Human Action 6(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-021-00104-9

4. Barbelet V (2018) As local as possible, as international as necessary. Available at: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/As_local_as_possible_as_international_as_necessary_understanding_capacity_and_comp.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2021.

5. Barbelet, V (2019) Rethinking capacity and complementarity for a more local humanitarian action. In: Overseas Development Institute. Available at: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/12957.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2021

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3