Physiological-based cord clamping in very preterm infants: the Aeration, Breathing, Clamping 3 (ABC3) trial—statistical analysis plan for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Author:
Willemsen Sten P., Knol RonnyORCID, Brouwer Emma, van den Akker Thomas, DeKoninck Philip L. J., Lopriore Enrico, Onland Wes, de Boode Willem P., van Kaam Anton H., Nuytemans Debbie H., Reiss Irwin K. M., Hutten G. Jeroen, Prins Sandra A., Mulder Estelle E. M., Hulzebos Christian V., van Sambeeck Sam J., van der Putten Mayke E., Zonnenberg Inge A., te Pas Arjan B., Vermeulen Marijn J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Mortality, cerebral injury, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are common complications of very preterm birth. An important risk factor for these complications is hemodynamic instability. Pre-clinical studies suggest that the timing of umbilical cord clamping affects hemodynamic stability during transition. Standard care is time-based cord clamping (TBCC), with clamping irrespective of lung aeration. It is unknown whether delaying cord clamping until lung aeration and ventilation have been established (physiological-based cord clamping, PBCC) is more beneficial. This document describes the statistical analyses for the ABC3 trial, which aims to assess the efficacy and safety of PBCC, compared to TBCC.
Methods
The ABC3 trial is a multicenter, randomized trial investigating PBCC (intervention) versus TBCC (control) in very preterm infants. The trial is ethically approved. Preterm infants born before 30 weeks of gestation are randomized after parental informed consent.
The primary outcome is intact survival, defined as the composite of survival without major cerebral injury and/or NEC. Secondary short-term outcomes are co-morbidities and adverse events assessed during NICU admission, parental reported outcomes, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes assessed at a corrected age of 2 years.
To test the hypothesis that PBCC increases intact survival, a logistic regression model will be estimated using generalized estimating equations (accounting for correlation between siblings and observations in the same center) with treatment and gestational age as predictors. This plan is written and submitted without knowledge of the data.
Discussion
The findings of this trial will provide evidence for future clinical guidelines on optimal cord clamping management at birth.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03808051. Registered on 17 January 2019.
Funder
ZonMw Stichting Vrienden van het Sophia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference13 articles.
1. Knol R, Brouwer E, van den Akker T, DeKoninck PLJ, Lopriore E, Onland W, et al. Physiological-based cord clamping in very preterm infants: the Aeration, Breathing, Clamping 3 (ABC3) trial-study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):838. 2. Madar J, Roehr CC, Ainsworth S, Ersdal H, Morley C, Rudiger M, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth. Resuscitation. 2021;161:291–326. 3. Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, Hallman M, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Ozek E, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome: 2022 update. Neonatology. 2023;120(1):3–23. 4. Bhatt S, Alison BJ, Wallace EM, Crossley KJ, Gill AW, Kluckow M, et al. Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. J Physiol. 2013;591(8):2113–26. 5. Knol R, Brouwer E, Vernooij ASN, Klumper F, DeKoninck P, Hooper SB, et al. Clinical aspects of incorporating cord clamping into stabilisation of preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(5):F493–7.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|