Abstract
AbstractBackgroundCOVID-19 spread rapidly in UK care homes for older people in the early pandemic. National infection control recommendations included remote resident assessment. A region in North-West England introduced a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker for homes to identify early signs of resident deterioration to facilitate care responses. We examined the implementation, uptake and use of the tracker in care homes across four geographical case study localities in the first year of the pandemic.MethodsThis was a rapid, mixed-methods, multi-locality case study. Tracker uptake was calculated using the number of care homes taking up the tracker as a proportion of the total number of care homes in a locality. Mean tracker use was summarised at locality level and compared. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals involved in tracker implementation and used to explore implementation factors across localities. Template Analysis with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the interpretation of qualitative data.ResultsUptake varied across the four case study localities ranging between 13.8 and 77.8%.Tracker use decreased in all localities over time at different rates, with average use ranging between 18 and 58%. The implementation context differed between localities and the process of implementation deviated over time from the initially planned strategy, for stakeholder engagement and care homes’ training. Four interpretative themes reflected the most influential factors appearing to affect tracker uptake and use: (1) the process of implementation, (2) implementation readiness, (3) clarity of purpose/perceived value and (4) relative priority in the context of wider system pressures.ConclusionsOur study findings resonate with the digital solutions evidence base prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting three key factors that can inform future development and implementation of rapid digital responses in care home settings even in times of crisis: an incremental approach to implementation with testing of organisational readiness and attention to implementation climate, particularly the innovation’s fit with local contexts (i.e. systems, infrastructure, work processes and practices); involvement of end-users in innovation design and development; and enabling users’ easy access to sustained, high-quality, appropriate training and support to enable staff to adapt to digital solutions.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Dunn P, Allen L, Humphries R, Alderwick H. Adult social care and COVID-19. Assessing the policy response in England so far, 2020. Health Foundation. https://www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/adult-social-care-and-covid-19-assessing-the-policy-response-in-england. Accessed on 21 Nov 2022.
2. Giebel C, Hanna K, Cannon J, et al. Taking the ‘care’ out of care homes: the moral dilemma of institutional long-term care provision during COVID-19. Health Soc Care Commun. 2021;00:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13651.
3. House of Commons Health and Social Care and Science and Technology Committees. Coronavirus: Lessons learned to date: Sixth report of the health and social care committee and third report of the science and technology committee of session 2021–22. https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7497/documents/78688/default/. Accessed on 21 Nov 2022.
4. Devi R, Hinsliff-Smith K, Goodman C, Gordon AL. The COVID-19 pandemic in UK care homes – revealing the cracks in the system. J Nursing Home Res. 2020;6:58–60. https://doi.org/10.14283/jnhrs.2020.17.
5. Hodgson K, Grimm F, Vestesson E, Brine R, Deeny S. Adult social care and COVID-19. Assessing the impact on social care users and staff in England so far, 2020. Health Foundation. https://www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/adult-social-care-and-covid-19-assessing-the-impact-on-social-care-users-and-staff-in-england-so-far. Accessed on 21 Nov 2022.