Abstract
Abstract
Background
68 Ga-PSMA PET is the leading prostate cancer imaging technique, but the image quality remains noisy and could be further improved using an artificial intelligence-based denoising algorithm. To address this issue, we analyzed the overall quality of reprocessed images compared to standard reconstructions. We also analyzed the diagnostic performances of the different sequences and the impact of the algorithm on lesion intensity and background measures.
Methods
We retrospectively included 30 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who had undergone 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT. We simulated images produced using only a quarter, half, three-quarters, or all of the acquired data material reprocessed using the SubtlePET® denoising algorithm. Three physicians with different levels of experience blindly analyzed every sequence and then used a 5-level Likert scale to assess the series. The binary criterion of lesion detectability was compared between series. We also compared lesion SUV, background uptake, and diagnostic performances of the series (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy).
Results
VPFX-derived series were classified differently but better than standard reconstructions (p < 0.001) using half the data. Q.Clear series were not classified differently using half the signal. Some series were noisy but had no significant effect on lesion detectability (p > 0.05). The SubtlePET® algorithm significantly decreased lesion SUV (p < 0.005) and increased liver background (p < 0.005) and had no substantial effect on the diagnostic performance of each reader.
Conclusion
We show that the SubtlePET® can be used for 68 Ga-PSMA scans using half the signal with similar image quality to Q.Clear series and superior quality to VPFX series. However, it significantly modifies quantitative measurements and should not be used for comparative examinations if standard algorithm is applied during follow-up.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference37 articles.
1. Liu J, Malekzadeh M, Mirian N, Song TA, Liu C, Dutta J. Artificial intelligence-based image enhancement in PET imaging: noise reduction and resolution enhancement. PET Clin. 2021;16(4):553–76.
2. Katsari K, Penna D, Arena V, Polverari G, Ianniello A, Italiano D, et al. Artificial intelligence for reduced dose 18F-FDG PET examinations: a real-world deployment through a standardized framework and business case assessment. EJNMMI Phys. 2021;8(1):25.
3. Chaudhari AS, Mittra E, Davidzon GA, Gulaka P, Gandhi H, Brown A, et al. Low-count whole-body PET with deep learning in a multicenter and externally validated study. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):127.
4. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. arXiv:150504597 [cs] [Internet]. 2015 May 18 [cited 2022 Feb 28]; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597
5. Chen KT, Gong E, de Carvalho Macruz FB, Xu J, Boumis A, Khalighi M, et al. Ultra–low-dose 18F-Florbetaben amyloid PET imaging using deep learning with multi-contrast MRI inputs. Radiology. 2019;290(3):649–56.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献