Abstract
Abstract
Background
In Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid- β (A β) peptides aggregate in the lowering CSF amyloid levels - a key pathological hallmark of the disease. However, lowered CSF amyloid levels may also be present in cognitively unimpaired elderly individuals. Therefore, it is of great value to explain the variance in disease progression among patients with A β pathology.
Methods
A cohort of n=2293 participants, of whom n=749 were A β positive, was selected from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database to study heterogeneity in disease progression for individuals with A β pathology. The analysis used baseline clinical variables including demographics, genetic markers, and neuropsychological data to predict how the cognitive ability and AD diagnosis of subjects progressed using statistical models and machine learning. Due to the relatively low prevalence of A β pathology, models fit only to A β-positive subjects were compared to models fit to an extended cohort including subjects without established A β pathology, adjusting for covariate differences between the cohorts.
Results
A β pathology status was determined based on the A β42/A β40 ratio. The best predictive model of change in cognitive test scores for A β-positive subjects at the 2-year follow-up achieved an R2 score of 0.388 while the best model predicting adverse changes in diagnosis achieved a weighted F1 score of 0.791. A β-positive subjects declined faster on average than those without A β pathology, but the specific level of CSF A β was not predictive of progression rate. When predicting cognitive score change 4 years after baseline, the best model achieved an R2 score of 0.325 and it was found that fitting models to the extended cohort improved performance. Moreover, using all clinical variables outperformed the best model based only on a suite of cognitive test scores which achieved an R2 score of 0.228.
Conclusion
Our analysis shows that CSF levels of A β are not strong predictors of the rate of cognitive decline in A β-positive subjects when adjusting for other variables. Baseline assessments of cognitive function accounts for the majority of variance explained in the prediction of 2-year decline but is insufficient for achieving optimal results in longer-term predictions. Predicting changes both in cognitive test scores and in diagnosis provides multiple perspectives of the progression of potential AD subjects.
Funder
Vetenskapsrådet
Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
Swedish Alzheimer's Association
Hj\"{a}rnfonden
Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement
EU Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Disease Research
European Research Council
Swedish State Support for Clinical Research
AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer's Association
Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse
Olav Thon Foundation
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement
UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL
Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
Chalmers Tekniska H\"{o}gskola
Chalmers University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Clinical Neurology,Neurology
Reference68 articles.
1. Association A. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheim Dement 2020. 2020; 16(3):391.
2. Lee G, Nho K, Kang B, Sohn K-A, Kim D. Predicting Alzheimer’s disease progression using multi-modal deep learning approach. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):1–12.
3. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, Iwatsubo T, Jack Jr CR, Kaye J, Montine TJ, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheim Dement. 2011; 7(3):280–92.
4. Tábuas-Pereira M, Baldeiras I, Duro D, Santiago B, Ribeiro MH, Leitão MJ, Oliveira C, Santana I. Prognosis of early-onset vs. late-onset mild cognitive impairment: comparison of conversion rates and its predictors. Geriatrics. 2016; 1(2):11.
5. Mitchell A, Shiri-Feshki M. Temporal trends in the long term risk of progression of mild cognitive impairment: a pooled analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2008; 79(12):1386–91.