Author:
Shuman Benjamin R.,Totah Deema,Gates Deanna H.,Gao Fan,Ries Andrew J.,Russell Esposito Elizabeth
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The mechanical properties of an ankle–foot orthosis (AFO) play an important role in the gait mechanics of the end user. However, testing methodologies for evaluating these mechanical properties are not standardized. The purpose of this study was to compare five different evaluation frameworks to assess AFO stiffness.
Method
The same 13 carbon composite AFOs were tested with five different methods. Four previously reported custom test fixtures (the BRUCE, KST, SMApp, and EMPIRE) rotated an AFO into dorsiflexion about a defined axis in the sagittal plane. The fifth method involved quasi-static deflection of AFOs into dorsiflexion by hanging weights (HW) from the footplate. AFO rotational stiffness was calculated as the linear fit of the AFO resistive torque and angular deflection. Differences between methods were assessed using descriptive statistics and a repeated measures Friedman with post-hoc Bonferroni–Holm adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Results
There were significant differences in measured AFO stiffnesses between test methods. Specifically, the BRUCE and HW methods measured lower stiffness than both the EMPIRE and the KST. Stiffnesses measured by the SMApp were not significantly different than any test method. Stiffnesses were lowest in the HW method, where motion was not constrained to a single plane. The median difference in absolute AFO stiffness across methods was 1.03 Nm/deg with a range of [0.40 to 2.35] Nm/deg. The median relative percent difference, measured as the range of measured stiffness from the five methods over the average measured stiffness was 62% [range 13% to 156%]. When the HW method was excluded, the four previously reported test fixtures produced a median difference in absolute AFO stiffness of 0.52 [range 0.38 to 2.17] Nm/deg with a relative percent difference between the methods of 27% [range 13% to 89%].
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the importance of developing mechanical testing standards, similar to those that exist for lower limb prosthetics. Lacking standardization, differences in methodology can result in large differences in measured stiffness, particularly for different constraints on motion. Non-uniform measurement practices may limit the clinical utility of AFO stiffness as a metric in AFO prescription and future research.
Funder
Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
DoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Rehabilitation
Reference28 articles.
1. Totah D, Menon M, Jones-Hershinow C, Barton K, Gates DH. The impact of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on gait: a systematic literature review. Gait Posture. 2019;69:101–11.
2. Condie E. Report of a Concensus Conference on the Orthotic Management of Stroke Patients. 1st ed. Copenhagen: International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; 2004.
3. Ries AJ, Novacheck TF, Schwartz MH. The efficacy of ankle-foot orthoses on improving the gait of children with diplegic cerebral palsy : a multiple outcome analysis. PM R. 2015;7:922–9.
4. Ielapi A, Forward M, De BM. Computational and experimental evaluation of the mechanical properties of ankle foot orthoses: a literature review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43:339–48.
5. Kobayashi T, Leung AKL, Hutchins SW. Techniques to measure rigidity of ankle-foot orthosis: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:565–76.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献