Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, microeconometrics experienced the ‘credibility revolution’, culminating in the 2021 Nobel prices for David Card, Josh Angrist, and Guido Imbens. This ‘revolution’ in how to do empirical work led to more reliable empirical knowledge of the causal effects of certain public policies. In parallel, computer science, and to some extent also statistics, developed powerful (so-called Machine Learning) algorithms that are very successful in prediction tasks. The new literature on Causal Machine Learning unites these developments by using algorithms originating in Machine Learning for improved causal analysis. In this non-technical overview, I review some of these approaches. Subsequently, I use an empirical example from the field of active labour market programme evaluation to showcase how Causal Machine Learning can be applied to improve the usefulness of such studies. I conclude with some considerations about shortcomings and possible future developments of these methods as well as wider implications for teaching and empirical studies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Statistics and Probability
Reference79 articles.
1. Amram, M., Dunn, J., & Zhuo, Y. D. (2022). Optimal policy trees. Machine Learning, 111, 2741–2768.
2. Angrist, J. D. (2022). Empirical strategies in economics: Illuminating the path from cause to effect. Econometrica, 90, 2509–2539.
3. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3
4. Arthur, D., & Vassilvitskii, S. (2007). k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (pp. 1027–1035). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Philadelphia, PA, USA.
5. Athey, S. (2017). Beyond prediction: Using big data for policy problems. Science, 355, 483–485.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Causal Machine Learning in Social Impact Assessment;Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology;2023-10-16
2. Kausale Inferenz;Moderne Verfahren der Angewandten Statistik;2023-09-20