Non-invasive respiratory support in SARS-CoV-2 related acute respiratory distress syndrome: when is it most appropriate to start treatment?
-
Published:2022-12-03
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1465-993X
-
Container-title:Respiratory Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Respir Res
Author:
Nevola RiccardoORCID, Russo Antonio, Scuotto Samuel, Imbriani Simona, Aprea Concetta, Abitabile Marianna, Beccia Domenico, Brin Chiara, Carusone Caterina, Cinone Francesca, Cirigliano Giovanna, Colantuoni Sara, Cozzolino Domenico, Cuomo Giovanna, Del Core Micol, Gjeloshi Klodian, Marrone Aldo, Medicamento Giulia, Meo Luciana Agnese, Nappo Francesco, Padula Andrea, Pafundi Pia Clara, Ranieri Roberta, Ricozzi Carmen, Rinaldi Luca, Romano Ciro Pasquale, Ruocco Rachele, Ruosi Carolina, Salvati Annabella, Sasso Ferdinando Carlo, Sellitto Ausilia, Sommese Pino, Villani Angela, Coppola Nicola, Adinolfi Luigi Elio
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Non-Invasive Respiratory Support (NRS) as Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and/or Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) has been proven as effective in the management of SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS. However, the most appropriate timing for start NRS is unknown.
Methods
We conducted a prospective pilot study including all consecutive patients who developed moderate SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS during hospitalization. Patients were randomly divided into two intervention groups according to ARDS severity (assessed by PaO2/FiO2-P/F) at NRS beginning: group A started CPAP/NIV when P/F was ≤ 200 and group B started CPAP/NIV when P/F was ≤ 150. Eligible patients who did not give their consent to CPAP/NIV until the severe stage of ARDS and started non-invasive treatment when P/F ≤ 100 (group C) was added. The considered outcomes were in-hospital mortality, oro-tracheal intubation (OTI) and days of hospitalization.
Results
Among 146 eligible patients, 29 underwent CPAP/NIV when P/F was ≤ 200 (Group A), 68 when P/F was ≤ 150 (Group B) and 31 patients agreed to non-invasive treatment only when P/F was ≤ 100 (Group C). Starting NRS at P/F level between 151 and 200 did not results in significant differences in the outcomes as compared to treatment starting with P/F ranging 101–150. Conversely, patients undergone CPAP/NIV in a moderate stage (P/F 101–200) had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate (13.4 vs. 29.0%, p = 0.044) and hospitalization length (14 vs. 15 days, p = 0.038) than those in the severe stage (P/F ≤ 100). Age and need for continuous ventilation were independent predictors of CPAP/NIV failure.
Conclusions
Starting CPAP/NIV in patients with SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS in moderate stage (100 > P/F ≤ 200) is associated to a reduction of both in-hospital mortality and hospitalization length compared to the severe stage (P/F ≤ 100). Starting CPAP/NIV with a P/F > 150 does not appear to be of clinical utility.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Grieco DL, Menga LS, Cesarano M, Rosà T, Spadaro S, Bitondo MM, COVID-ICU Gemelli Study Group, et al. Effect of helmet noninvasive ventilation vs high-flow nasal oxygen on days free of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe hypoxemic respiratory failure: the HENIVOT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325:1731–43. 2. Pfeifer M, Ewig S, Voshaar T, Randerath WJ, Bauer T, Geiseler J, et al. Position paper for the state-of-the-art application of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19. Respiration. 2020;99:521–42. 3. Bertaina M, Nuñez-Gil IJ, Franchin L, Fernández Rozas I, Arroyo-Espliguero R, Viana-Llamas MC, HOPE COVID-19 investigators, et al. Non-invasive ventilation for SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory failure: a subanalysis from the HOPE COVID-19 registry. Emerg Med J. 2021;38:359–65. 4. Nightingale R, Lewis J, Monsell KR, Jones L, Smith C, Kundu S, et al. CPAP delivered outside critical care during the second wave of COVID-19: outcomes from a UK respiratory surge unit. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021;8: e000907. 5. Brusasco C, Corradi F, Di Domenico A, Raggi F, Timossi G, Santori G, Galliera CPAP-Covid-19 study group, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure in COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2021;57:2002524.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|