Author:
Pasupa Kitsuchart,Rathasamuth Wanthanee,Tongsima Sissades
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The number of porcine Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) used in genetic association studies is very large, suitable for statistical testing. However, in breed classification problem, one needs to have a much smaller porcine-classifying SNPs (PCSNPs) set that could accurately classify pigs into different breeds. This study attempted to find such PCSNPs by using several combinations of feature selection and classification methods. We experimented with different combinations of feature selection methods including information gain, conventional as well as modified genetic algorithms, and our developed frequency feature selection method in combination with a common classification method, Support Vector Machine, to evaluate the method’s performance. Experiments were conducted on a comprehensive data set containing SNPs from native pigs from America, Europe, Africa, and Asia including Chinese breeds, Vietnamese breeds, and hybrid breeds from Thailand.
Results
The best combination of feature selection methods—information gain, modified genetic algorithm, and frequency feature selection hybrid—was able to reduce the number of possible PCSNPs to only 1.62% (164 PCSNPs) of the total number of SNPs (10,210 SNPs) while maintaining a high classification accuracy (95.12%). Moreover, the near-identical performance of this PCSNPs set to those of bigger data sets as well as even the entire data set. Moreover, most PCSNPs were well-matched to a set of 94 genes in the PANTHER pathway, conforming to a suggestion by the Porcine Genomic Sequencing Initiative.
Conclusions
The best hybrid method truly provided a sufficiently small number of porcine SNPs that accurately classified swine breeds.
Funder
Faculty of Information Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Structural Biology
Reference38 articles.
1. Larrañaga P, Calvo B, Santana R, Bielza C, Galdiano J, Inza I, et al.Machine learning in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinformatics. 2006; 7(1):86–112. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/bib/bbk007.
2. Tang J, Alelyani S, Liu H. Feature selection for classification: A review. In: Data Classification: Algorithms and Applications. CRC Press: 2014. p. 37–64. https://doi.org/doi:10.1201/b17320.
3. Kwak N, Choi CH. Input feature selection for classification problems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2002; 13(1):143–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.977291.
4. Saeys Y, Inza I, Larrañaga P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(19):2507–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm344.
5. Lazar C, Taminau J, Meganck S, Steenhoff D, Coletta A, Molter C, et al.A Survey on Filter Techniques for Feature Selection in Gene Expression Microarray Analysis. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics. 2012; 9(4):1106–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2012.33.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献