Prospective analysis of circulating metabolites and breast cancer in EPIC
-
Published:2019-09-24
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:
-
ISSN:1741-7015
-
Container-title:BMC Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Med
Author:
His Mathilde,Viallon Vivian,Dossus Laure,Gicquiau Audrey,Achaintre David,Scalbert Augustin,Ferrari Pietro,Romieu Isabelle,Onland-Moret N. Charlotte,Weiderpass Elisabete,Dahm Christina C.,Overvad Kim,Olsen Anja,Tjønneland Anne,Fournier Agnès,Rothwell Joseph A.,Severi Gianluca,Kühn Tilman,Fortner Renée T.,Boeing Heiner,Trichopoulou Antonia,Karakatsani Anna,Martimianaki Georgia,Masala Giovanna,Sieri Sabina,Tumino Rosario,Vineis Paolo,Panico Salvatore,van Gils Carla H.,Nøst Therese H.,Sandanger Torkjel M.,Skeie Guri,Quirós J. Ramón,Agudo Antonio,Sánchez Maria-Jose,Amiano Pilar,Huerta José María,Ardanaz Eva,Schmidt Julie A.,Travis Ruth C.,Riboli Elio,Tsilidis Konstantinos K.,Christakoudi Sofia,Gunter Marc J.,Rinaldi Sabina
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Metabolomics is a promising molecular tool to identify novel etiologic pathways leading to cancer. Using a targeted approach, we prospectively investigated the associations between metabolite concentrations in plasma and breast cancer risk.
Methods
A nested case-control study was established within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer cohort, which included 1624 first primary incident invasive breast cancer cases (with known estrogen and progesterone receptor and HER2 status) and 1624 matched controls. Metabolites (n = 127, acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, glycerophospholipids, hexose, sphingolipids) were measured by mass spectrometry in pre-diagnostic plasma samples and tested for associations with breast cancer incidence using multivariable conditional logistic regression.
Results
Among women not using hormones at baseline (n = 2248), and after control for multiple tests, concentrations of arginine (odds ratio [OR] per SD = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–0.90), asparagine (OR = 0.83 (0.74–0.92)), and phosphatidylcholines (PCs) ae C36:3 (OR = 0.83 (0.76–0.90)), aa C36:3 (OR = 0.84 (0.77–0.93)), ae C34:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78–0.94)), ae C36:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78–0.88)), and ae C38:2 (OR = 0.84 (0.76–0.93)) were inversely associated with breast cancer risk, while the acylcarnitine C2 (OR = 1.23 (1.11–1.35)) was positively associated with disease risk. In the overall population, C2 (OR = 1.15 (1.06–1.24)) and PC ae C36:3 (OR = 0.88 (0.82–0.95)) were associated with risk of breast cancer, and these relationships did not differ by breast cancer subtype, age at diagnosis, fasting status, menopausal status, or adiposity.
Conclusions
These findings point to potentially novel pathways and biomarkers of breast cancer development. Results warrant replication in other epidemiological studies.
Funder
French National Cancer Institute Fondation ARC European Commission International Agency for Research on Cancer Danish Cancer Society Ligue Contre le Cancer Institut Gustave Roussy Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale German Cancer Aid German Cancer Research Center Federal Ministry of Education and Research Deutsche Krebshilfe Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Hellenic Health Foundation Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy National Research Council Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports Netherlands Cancer Registry LK Research Funds Dutch Prevention Funds Dutch ZON World Cancer Research Fund Statistics Netherlands European Research Council Nordforsk Nordic Centre of Excellence programme on Food, Nutrition and Health Regional Governments of Andalucía Regional Governments of Asturias Regional Governments of Basque Country Regional Governments of Murcia Regional Governments of Navarra CERCA Program Swedish Cancer Society Swedish Research Council County Councils of Skåne and Västerbotten Cancer Research UK Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. 2. World Cancer Research Fund International / American Institute for Cancer Research: Continuous update project report: diet, nutrition and physical activity and breast cancer. 2017. 3. Gaudet MM, Gierach GL, Carter BD, Luo J, Milne RL, Weiderpass E, Giles GG, Tamimi RM, Eliassen AH, Rosner B, et al. Pooled analysis of nine cohorts reveals breast cancer risk factors by tumor molecular subtype. Cancer Res. 2018;78(20):6011–21. 4. Parkin DM, Boyd L, Walker LC. 16. The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(Suppl 2):S77–81. 5. Brown KF, Rumgay H, Dunlop C, Ryan M, Quartly F, Cox A, Deas A, Elliss-Brookes L, Gavin A, Hounsome L, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(8):1130–41.
Cited by
93 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|