Comparative assessment of methods for short-term forecasts of COVID-19 hospital admissions in England at the local level

Author:

Meakin SophieORCID,Abbott Sam,Bosse Nikos,Munday James,Gruson Hugo,Hellewell Joel,Sherratt Katharine,Chapman Lloyd A. C.,Prem Kiesha,Klepac Petra,Jombart Thibaut,Knight Gwenan M.,Jafari Yalda,Flasche Stefan,Waites William,Jit Mark,Eggo Rosalind M.,Villabona-Arenas C. Julian,Russell Timothy W.,Medley Graham,Edmunds W. John,Davies Nicholas G.,Liu Yang,Hué Stéphane,Brady Oliver,Pung Rachael,Abbas Kaja,Gimma Amy,Mee Paul,Endo Akira,Clifford Samuel,Sun Fiona Yueqian,McCarthy Ciara V.,Quilty Billy J.,Rosello Alicia,Sandmann Frank G.,Barnard Rosanna C.,Kucharski Adam J.,Procter Simon R.,Jarvis Christopher I.,Gibbs Hamish P.,Hodgson David,Lowe Rachel,Atkins Katherine E.,Koltai Mihaly,Pearson Carl A. B.,Finch Emilie,Wong Kerry L. M.,Quaife Matthew,O’Reilly Kathleen,Tully Damien C.,Funk Sebastian,

Abstract

Abstract Background Forecasting healthcare demand is essential in epidemic settings, both to inform situational awareness and facilitate resource planning. Ideally, forecasts should be robust across time and locations. During the COVID-19 pandemic in England, it is an ongoing concern that demand for hospital care for COVID-19 patients in England will exceed available resources. Methods We made weekly forecasts of daily COVID-19 hospital admissions for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England between August 2020 and April 2021 using three disease-agnostic forecasting models: a mean ensemble of autoregressive time series models, a linear regression model with 7-day-lagged local cases as a predictor, and a scaled convolution of local cases and a delay distribution. We compared their point and probabilistic accuracy to a mean-ensemble of them all and to a simple baseline model of no change from the last day of admissions. We measured predictive performance using the weighted interval score (WIS) and considered how this changed in different scenarios (the length of the predictive horizon, the date on which the forecast was made, and by location), as well as how much admissions forecasts improved when future cases were known. Results All models outperformed the baseline in the majority of scenarios. Forecasting accuracy varied by forecast date and location, depending on the trajectory of the outbreak, and all individual models had instances where they were the top- or bottom-ranked model. Forecasts produced by the mean-ensemble were both the most accurate and most consistently accurate forecasts amongst all the models considered. Forecasting accuracy was improved when using future observed, rather than forecast, cases, especially at longer forecast horizons. Conclusions Assuming no change in current admissions is rarely better than including at least a trend. Using confirmed COVID-19 cases as a predictor can improve admissions forecasts in some scenarios, but this is variable and depends on the ability to make consistently good case forecasts. However, ensemble forecasts can make forecasts that make consistently more accurate forecasts across time and locations. Given minimal requirements on data and computation, our admissions forecasting ensemble could be used to anticipate healthcare needs in future epidemic or pandemic settings.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3