Abstract
AbstractThis paper proposes a conceptual performance assessment tool for evaluating the environmental performance in small seaports. The developed tool is based and built based on a literature review. Ports, depending on their size, tend to have several sustainability and environmental management needs. However, especially small or cargo specialized ports do not often have sufficient resources to implement environmental effectiveness enhancing tools, even if they need them. This paper reviews international quality and environmental management tools, standards, and selected frameworks. These include International Organization for Standardization standards, and Global Reporting Initiative and Corporate Social Responsibility concepts. Because checklist type self-diagnosis solutions are the easiest to adopt, and universally most applicable, the proposed environmental performance measurement tool has four specific categories: (1) environmental management; (2) responsibility; (3) impact assessment; and (4) self-monitoring. The proposed tool allows the ports to assess whether their environmental management practices are comparable to more expensive standards and certificates. The paper concludes with a discussion on the limitations and challenges related to different port types and their specific needs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. Aakko-Saksa P, Murtonen T, Vesala H, Koponen P, Nyyssönen S, Puustinen H, Lehtoranta K, Timonen T, Teinilä K, Hillamo R, Karjalainen P, Kuittinen N, Simonen P, Rönkkö T, Keskinen J, Saukko E, Tutuiany M, Fischerleitner R, Pirjola, L, Brunila O-P, Hämäläinen E (2016) Black carbon measurements using different marine fuels. 28th CIMAC World Congress on Combustion Engines, Helsinki, Finland. Paper nr. 068. Available in CIMAC conference database at https://tecfinder.wti-frankfurt.de/tecfinder/faces/facelets/search/fullview/extended_fullview.jsp#ancore_full_view. Accessed 7 Mar 2023.
2. Alvares-Carcia J, del RioRama M (2016) Sustainability and EMAS: impact of motivations and barriers on the perceived benefits from the adoption of standards. Sustainability 8(10):1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101057
3. Álvarez P (2021) From maritime salvage to IMO 2020 strategy: two actions to protect the environment. Mar Pollut Bull 170:112590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112590
4. Animah I, Addy-Lamptey A, Korsah F, Sackey JS (2018) Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI regulation 14 by ships in the Gulf of Guinea sub-region: issues, challenges and opportunities. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 62:441–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.03.020
5. Barkin JS (2015) On the heuristic use of formal models in international relations theory. Int Stud Rev 17(4):617–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12253
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献