Author:
Atmann Oxana,Linde Klaus,Werner Christoph,Dorn Ulrike,Schneider Antonius
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although the impact of asthma education on important outcomes (e.g. emergency visits) has been well established, only an estimated quarter of asthma patients in Germany have received patient education yet. The aim of the study was to identify patient factors that could increase participation in asthma education programs.
Methods
This cross-sectional study investigated participation factors and differences between trained (n = 64) and untrained (n = 65) asthma patients from a large outpatient center in Germany. The survey included answers to asthma-related questions and open questions on patient education as well as such about knowledge of health literacy and eHealth.
Results
Mean age of participants was 55 ± 19 years and 61% were female. Trained patients were more likely to participate in disease management programs (odds ratio (OR) 6.85; 95%CI 2.17–21.59), were more frequently non-smokers (OR 0.07; 95%CI 0.01–0.85) and more often had an asthma action plan (OR 20.2; 1.55–263.41). Open questions’ analysis of untrained asthma patients revealed that patients felt they were not adequately informed about asthma education (37%). About one-third of all patients (27%) showed openness to online asthma education. Analysis of HL and eHealth showed no difference between the groups.
Conclusion
Untrained asthma patients should be informed even more intensively by their physicians about the importance and value of asthma education. Asthma education does not seem to benefit patients’ health literacy. Online asthma education is of interest to approximately one-third of asthma patients. This should be motivation to develop and implement online asthma education concepts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Gibson PG, Ram FS, Powell H. Asthma education. Respir Med. 2003;97(9):1036–44.
2. de Vries U, Brandes I, Krauth C, Petermann F. Patient education in pulmonary rehabilitation: results of an implementation study. Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)). 2008;70(10):572–81.
3. Mehring M, Donnachie E, Mutschler R, Hoffmann F, Keller M, Schneider A. Disease management programs for patients with asthma in Germany: a longitudinal population-based study. Respir Care. 2013;58(7):1170–7.
4. Lingner H, Burger B, Kardos P, Criee CP, Worth H, Hummers-Pradier E. What patients really think about asthma guidelines: barriers to guideline implementation from the patients’ perspective. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0346-6.
5. Bundesversicherungsamt. Anlage 2a: Schulungsprogramme für Patientinnen und Patienten (Stand April 2017) aus: Zulassung der strukturierten Behandlungsprogramme (Disease Management Programme - DMP) durch das Bundesversicherungsamt (BVA) (aufgerufen 26.11.2017): Bundesversicherungsamt; 2016. Available from: http://www.bundesversicherungsamt.de/weiteres/disease-management-programme/zulassung-disease-management-programme-dmp.html. Accessed 26 Nov 2017.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献