Assessment Tools for Measuring Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy in a Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review

Author:

Dijkman Eline M.12,ter Brake Wouter W. M.1ORCID,Drossaert Constance H. C.3,Doggen Carine J. M.14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands

2. Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands

3. Department of Psychology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands

4. Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands

Abstract

Assessment of (digital) health literacy in the hospital can raise staff awareness and facilitate tailored communication, leading to improved health outcomes. Assessment tools should ideally address multiple domains of health literacy, fit to the complex hospital context and have a short administration time, to enable routine assessment. This review aims to create an overview of tools for measuring (digital) health literacy in hospitals. A search in Scopus, PubMed, WoS and CINAHL, following PRISMA guidelines, generated 7252 hits; 251 studies were included in which 44 assessment tools were used. Most tools (57%) were self-reported and 27% reported an administration time of <5 min. Almost all tools addressed the domain ‘understanding’ (98%), followed by ‘access’ (52%), ‘apply’ (50%), ‘appraise’ (32%), ‘numeracy’ (18%), and ‘digital’ (18%). Only four tools were frequently used: the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy for Adults ((S)TOFHLA), the Brief Health Literacy Screener (BHLS), and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). While the NVS and BHLS have a low administration time, they cover only two domains. HLQ covers the most domains: access, understanding, appraise, and apply. None of these four most frequently used tools measured digital skills. This review can guide health professionals in choosing an instrument that is feasible in their daily practice, and measures the required domains.

Funder

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference316 articles.

1. OECD (2023, November 24). Length of Hospital Stay (Indicator). Available online: https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/length-of-hospital-stay.htm.

2. Health literacy: The gap between physicians and patients;Safeer;Am. Fam. Physician,2005

3. National Library of Medicine (2023, November 24). An Introduction to Health Literacy, Available online: https://www.nnlm.gov/guides/intro-health-literacy.

4. Sorensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., Brand, H., and Consortium Health Literacy Project, E. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12.

5. Health literacy in Europe: Comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU);Sorensen;Eur. J. Public Health,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3