Abstract
AbstractThis national study explored the role of digital technologies in early childhood education and care settings and whether they could contribute to quality improvement as reported by educators and assessors of quality in Australia. In this paper, data from Stage 2 of the Quality Improvement Research Project were used, which comprised 60 Quality Improvement Plans from educators linked with 60 Assessment and Rating reports from the assessors who visited early childhood centres as part of the administration of the National Quality Standards by each of Australia’s State and Territory jurisdictions. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory ( Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995).
Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G.
H. Elder, Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology
of human development (pp. 619–647). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10176-018; Bronfenbrenner & Ceci, Bronfenbrenner and Ceci, Psychological Review 101:568–586, 1994) was adopted to facilitate a systemic and dynamic view on the use of digital technologies in these 60 ECEC settings. References (e.g. comments/ suggestions/ examples) made by the educators about the implementation of digital technologies were counted and thematically analysed. Results revealed the strong role new technologies (e.g. documentation and management platforms, tablets, apps, etc.) play in the majority of ECEC settings and especially in relation to three of the seven Quality Areas: Educational programme and practice (Quality Area 1); Collaborative partnerships with families and communities (Quality Area 6) and Governance and leadership (Quality Area 7). Future directions for research are suggested and implications for embracing a more holistic, integrated and broad view on the use of digital technologies are discussed.
Funder
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Community and Home Care,Pediatrics,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference80 articles.
1. Abdullahi, N. J. K., & Adebayo, T. A. (2019). Digitization in education system and management of early childhood care education in Nigeria. Southeast Asia Early Childhood, 8(2), 28–42.
2. Ackerman, D. J. (2017). Online child care training in the United States: A preliminary investigation of who participates, what is offered, and on which topics the workforce is focusing. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 11(1), 1–22.
3. Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2012). National quality framework for early childhood education and care. ACECQA. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/national-quality-framework
4. Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2018). Quality rating reassessments. An analysis of quality improvement in education and care settings 2013–201. Occasional Paper 6. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-07/OccasionalPaper6_QualityRatingReassessments.pdf
5. Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2020). Guide to the National quality framework. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-03/Guide-to-the-NQFcompressed.pdf
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献