Abstract
AbstractDuplicate record is a common problem within data sets especially in huge volume databases. The accuracy of duplicate detection determines the efficiency of duplicate removal process. However, duplicate detection has become more challenging due to the presence of missing values within the records where during the clustering and matching process, missing values can cause records deemed similar to be inserted into the wrong group, hence, leading to undetected duplicates. In this paper, duplicate detection improvement was proposed despite the presence of missing values within a data set through Duplicate Detection within the Incomplete Data set (DDID) method. The missing values were hypothetically added to the key attributes of three data sets under study, using an arbitrary pattern to simulate both complete and incomplete data sets. The results were analyzed, then, the performance of duplicate detection was evaluated by using the Hot Deck method to compensate for the missing values in the key attributes. It was hypothesized that by using Hot Deck, duplicate detection performance would be improved. Furthermore, the DDID performance was compared to an early duplicate detection method namely DuDe, in terms of its accuracy and speed. The findings yielded that even though the data sets were incomplete, DDID was able to offer a better accuracy and faster duplicate detection as compared to DuDe. The results of this study offer insights into constraints of duplicate detection within incomplete data sets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Information Systems
Reference57 articles.
1. Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S. A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J Manag. 2000;26(3):463–88.
2. Shilane P, Chitloor R, Jonnala UK. 99 deduplication problems. In: 8th USENIX workshop on hot topics in storage and file systems (HotStorage 16), USENIX association, Denver, CO. 2016. p. 1–5.
3. Xia W, Jiang H, Feng D, Douglis F, Shilane P, Hua Y, Fu M, Zhang Y, Zhou Y. A comprehensive study of the past, present, and future of data deduplication. Proc IEEE. 2016;104(9):1681–710.
4. Chernov I, Ivashko E, Rumiantsev A, Ponomarev V, Shabaev A. Survey on deduplication techniques in flash-based storage. In: 2018 22nd conference of open innovations association (FRUCT). IEEE, Jyvaskyla, Finland. 2018.
5. Xu L, Pavlo A, Sengupta S, Ganger GR. Online deduplication for databases. In: proceedings of the 2017 ACM international conference on management of data. ACM, Chicago Illinois USA. 2017; p. 1355–68.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献