The non-linear nature of the cost of comprehensibility

Author:

Goethals SofieORCID,Martens David,Evgeniou Theodoros

Abstract

AbstractA key challenge in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been the potential trade-off between the accuracy and comprehensibility of machine learning models, as that also relates to their safe and trusted adoption. While there has been a lot of talk about this trade-off, there is no systematic study that assesses to what extent it exists, how often it occurs, and for what types of datasets. Based on the analysis of 90 benchmark classification datasets, we find that this trade-off exists for most (69%) of the datasets, but that somewhat surprisingly for the majority of cases it is rather small while for only a few it is very large. Comprehensibility can be enhanced by adding yet another algorithmic step, that of surrogate modelling using so-called ‘explainable’ models. Such models can improve the accuracy-comprehensibility trade-off, especially in cases where the black box was initially better. Finally, we find that dataset characteristics related to the complexity required to model the dataset, and the level of noise, can significantly explain this trade-off and thus the cost of comprehensibility. These insights lead to specific guidelines on how and when to apply AI algorithms when comprehensibility is required.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Information Systems

Reference71 articles.

1. Agrawal A. New York regulator orders probe into Goldman Sachs’ credit card practices over Apple Card and sexism; November 12, 2019. Medianama, Online, https://www.medianama.com/2019/11/223-apple-card-sexism-goldman-sachs/. Accessed 1 Feb 2022.

2. Martens D. Data Science ethics: concepts, Techniques and Cautionary Tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2022.

3. Wozniak S. Tweet; November 10, 2019. Twitter, Online, accessed February 1, 2022. https://twitter.com/stevewoz/status/1193330241478901760.

4. Breiman L. Statistical modeling: the two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Stat Sci. 2001;16(3):199–231.

5. Broad Agency Announcement, Explainable Artifcial Intelligence (XAI). https://www.darpa.mil/attachments/DARPA-BAA-16-53.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2020.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3