Abstract
AbstractThe existence of some differences in the results obtained from varying clustering k-means algorithms necessitated the need for a simplified approach in validation of cluster quality obtained. This is partly because of differences in the way the algorithms select their first seed or centroid either randomly, sequentially or some other principles influences which tend to influence the final result outcome. Popular external cluster quality validation and comparison models require the computation of varying clustering indexes such as Rand, Jaccard, Fowlkes and Mallows, Morey and Agresti Adjusted Rand Index (ARIMA) and Hubert and Arabie Adjusted Rand Index (ARIHA). In literature, Hubert and Arabie Adjusted Rand Index (ARIHA) has been adjudged as a good measure of cluster validity. Based on ARIHA as a popular clustering quality index, we developed OsamorSoft which constitutes DNA_Omatrix and OsamorSpreadSheet as a tool for cluster quality validation in high throughput analysis. The proposed method will help to bridge the yawning gap created by lesser number of friendly tools available to externally evaluate the ever-increasing number of clustering algorithms. Our implementation was tested alongside with clusters created with four k-means algorithms using malaria microarray data. Furthermore, our results evolved a compact 4-stage OsamorSpreadSheet statistics that our easy-to-use GUI java and spreadsheet-based tool of OsamorSoft uses for cluster quality comparison. It is recommended that a framework be evolved to facilitate the simplified integration and automation of several other cluster validity indexes for comparative analysis of big data problems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Information Systems
Reference54 articles.
1. MacQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multi-variate observations, in Proc. of the Fifth Berkeley Symp. on Math., LeCam, L.M., and Neyman, J., (eds.) Statistics and Probability, 1967.
2. Gower JC, Legendre P. Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. J Classif. 1986;3(1):5–48.
3. Batagelj V, Bren M. Comparing resemblance measures. J Classif. 1995;12(1):73–90.
4. Kanungo T, Mount DM, Netanyahu NS, Piatko CD, Silverman R, Wu AY. A local search approximation algorithm for k-means clustering. Comput Geom. 2004;28(2–3):89–112.
5. Albatineh AN, Niewiadomska-Bugaj M, Mihalko D. On Similarity indices and correction for chance agreement. J Classif. 2006;23(2):301–13.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献